This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
3D physics within 2D circuits


By combining 2D circuit design with 3D physics-based models of certain circuit components, engineers can develop simulations that are much more true to the real


world. Paul Schreier looks at a few companies who are spearheading developments in this area


developed using a schematic capture and simulation system, and tested in software before initial prototype circuits are built on a printed circuit board. IC designs are a more extreme version of the same process, because producing prototype silicon is costly, so extensive software simulations are


B 34 SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING WORLD


readboarding circuits has long since been replaced, to a large extent, with circuit simulators. Modern circuit designs are generally


performed before fabricating prototypes. One of the best-known circuit simulators


is SPICE, which has been in use for decades. With it, you describe the circuit with a series of models in a script (or ‘deck’), and the results are voltages and currents at every circuit node. However, simulations are only as accurate as the device models – and, for complex circuits or subtle behavior, results can be misleading or incorrect. The results can also be deceiving, because they’re


generally free of noise, crosstalk interference, etc., unless you make a point of including them in the models. Also, SPICE isn’t the best predictor of component failures.


SPICE alone won’t do the trick Today, though, many more aspects must be considered beyond just the parameters encapsulated in a SPICE model. A whitepaper from Ansys(1)


states that simulation is a


proven way to move beyond evaluating a single design parameter to evaluating the interaction between limitless design parameters across electrical, thermal and mechanical engineering disciplines. Obviously, for example, powerful electronics components crammed into tighter spaces must not be allowed to overheat. On the mechanical front, how do shock and vibration loads affect a component’s reliability?


www.scientific-computing.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40