This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
The Future—Optimization


Casting process simulation always displays the status quo of its expert user. The user decides if the rigging system or process parameter set led to an acceptable result. Addition- ally, proposals for optimized solutions have to come from the operator.


One of the biggest benefits of the casting process is also its biggest downfall: Everything happens at the same time and is coupled. Changes in one process parameter impact many casting quality defining features during the process, i.e., a change of the pouring temperature does not only change the solidification behavior, it also changes the fluidity of the melt, which can lead to a misrun. The metallurgy of the melt might be impacted, which could lead to changes in the tem- perature balance of the mold or die, which again can lead to problems with overheating or erosion. Multi-objective au- tonomous optimization offers a way out (Fig. 28). It uses the simulation tool as a virtual experimentation field and chang- es pouring conditions, gating designs or process parameters and tries this way to find the optimal route to fulfill the de- sired objective (Fig. 29). Several parameters can be changed and evaluated independently from each other (Fig. 30). Autonomous optimization tools take the classic approach of foundry engineers, to find the best compromise, and use validated physics. This does not only further reduce the need


for trial runs to find the optimal process window, but allows for the detailed evaluation of many process parameters and their individual impact on providing a robust process.


Obviously, only that which can be simulated can be opti- mized. Optimization, therefore, is not a replacement for pro- cess knowledge and expertise. Despite beliefs to the con- trary, the simulation user of the future needs to know the objectives and goals, and especially the quality criteria that are needed to reach these goals. The questions to ask a pro- gram are easy: What is a good gating system? To answer this question, quantitative solutions are required.


Summary


Considering the long tradition of casting, the history of cast- ing process simulation is a small cultural revolution within the industry. The 5,000 year-old art of casting through trial and error is transformed into a transparent, reproducible pro- cess where process parameters can not only be predicted, but also manipulated. Still, not all questions can be answered through simulation, but the current acceptance of this tool in foundries and by casting users confirms that casting process simulation is one of the key innovations of the last thirty years in the foundry world. Simula tion unlocks an enormous potential for cost reduction and leads thereby to an increased competitiveness of foundries.


Figure 28. Optimization Principle. Based on the initial designs optimization variables are defined. Typical variables are geometric changes, i.e. for riser size and/or position, as well as gating systems. At the same time a multi-objective optimization goal is determined, i.e. to achieve the maximum yield in combination with the smallest shrinkage defect. The optimization project runs many simulations to find the best compromise.


International Journal of Metalcasting/Spring 10


21


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89