search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
A


rchitects Florian Idenburg and Ilias Papageorgiou push open


the door to the roof of their Brooklyn office, only to be nearly knocked back by a heavy pulse of heat. It is July in New York, and the world is on the broiler setting. Scanning the ever-rising skyline of downtown Brooklyn, the two take a


moment to catch their breath. Finally, Papageorgiou speaks: “It is incredibly hot.” For him, it is a rare instance of stating the obvious. SO-IL, the firm


Papageorgiou and Idenburg share with partner Jing Liu (who also happens to be Idenburg’s wife), are architects with an immunity to the expected, and seem to delight in throwing their audience off-balance. Founded in 2008, the office reflects the hip cosmopolitanism of its hometown while embracing diversity: Idenburg is Dutch, Liu is Chinese, and Papageorgiou is Greek. The firm’s young associates are a similarly multicultural bunch, and what holds them together—besides air conditioning—is a shared commitment to architecture as an intellectual funhouse. “We don’t see our world as necessarily ‘one’ or ‘continuous’,” explains


Idenburg—an expression more characteristic of the firm’s gnomic, complex outlook. What that means is that their projects are often a half step off the beat, playing a game in which form and function are deliberately unreconciled. The game is especially intriguing in view of the fact that two of the partners—Liu and Idenburg—emerged from the offices of famed Japanese firm SANAA, where Idenburg took the lead on their New Museum building in Manhattan. In SO-IL’s recent projects, and in a suite of others coming down the pike, the firm follows the studiously smooth path laid down by SANAA, but has spiked it with a strategically placed speed bump. The first hint of this approach broke onto the design scene in the


middle of a different heat wave, back in 2010, when the firm debuted its winning proposal for MoMA PS1’s Young Architects Program. Visitors to the Queens museum that summer found its front courtyard covered by a giant net strung just overhead, secured by 25-foot poles; within the net, beach


194 culturedmag.com


balls hung alluringly, begging to be smacked. “It relates to an idea about openness,” says Papageorgiou. That sense of elasticity—and perhaps a little confusion—is a theme in


the office’s catalogue. Wrapping up work this year in Davis, California, the firm’s new Jan Shrem and Maria Manetti Shrem Museum of Art bucks the model of art spaces as sheltered sepulchers, creating instead a blended sequence of outdoor and indoor spaces that takes advantage of the local climate. At 50,000 square feet, the museum is vaulted over by a ribbed “Grand Canopy” that covers an exterior plaza and interior courtyards, striping both in alternating bands of light and shadow. “Galleries and curators don’t like daylight,” notes Liu. SO-IL’s determination to give museum-goers a bit of sunshine is a carefully calibrated assault on their own brief, and is what makes all their art projects seem so daringly non-conformist. Perhaps the most succinct distillation of SO-IL’s knack for ambiguity is


their upcoming custom line for famed furniture maker Knoll. A table that looks more like a multi-seat lounger; a chair just big enough that it’s unclear whether it’s meant for one person or two; a pouf whose ridged vectors suggest that anyone sitting on it will soon slide off—the eye-catching allure of SO-IL’s subtle subversions is obvious, but it hides a still bigger one: the suggestion that design is not, as a generation of architects has insisted, a rational tool for problem solving, but a beguilingly flawed and poetic social art. As Liu puts it, “We think maybe it’s okay to not to understand everything.” Amidst all this confusion, and in the heat of an afternoon that seems to


go on forever, there is one more thing that seems to float in the hazy realm of the unknown: the proper pronunciation of the firm’s name. Even some of the principals’ closest friends have said they don’t know the answer—and with good reason. There isn’t one. When asked, the team just laughs. “Which do you prefer?” responds


Papageorgiou.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244