search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Fig. 10. This ASTM A743 grade CF8 stainless steel as-cast microstruc- ture is shown with Oxalic acid etchant at 200X.


As a final example, a casting was successfully produced in


ASTM A743 grade CF8 stainless steel (304 SS). Te use of this component is confidential. Figure 9 shows the surface finish after shot blasting to remove the refractory coating. Te roughness matched the foam pattern, as this component was a prototype and cast from machined foam. Figures 10 and 11 show the as-cast microstructure at 200X and 400X. Table 3 shows the chemistry of the casting, which is within normal ranges. Again, the microstructure was uniform throughout with no evidence of carbon variation or pickup. Te microstructure also is the same as standard ASTM A743 grade CF8 stainless (304 SS) cast by other metalcast- ing techniques. Seven stainless steel heats were analyzed for carbon before


pouring and in the solidified castings. Tis allowed a deter- mination of carbon pick-up from the process. Te average carbon pickup in the process was 0.053% with a standard deviation of 0.0275%. Heats 6 and 7 had the lowest amounts of carbon at 0.032% and 0.034%.


Future Potential Steel in lost foam is just beginning commercialization, but it


has a strong potential for widespread adoption as a technology due to the cost saving benefits that the technology allows. Lost foam casting has advanced to the point that the casting of plain carbon and stainless steel is currently possible. It is used at three companies in the U.S. so far, and research reports indicate its use in a variety of other countries. Te majority of it is used in captive applications. For low carbon steels (less than 0.03%), more work needs


to be performed to better predict the carbon pick-up in the castings. Te grains of the stainless steel parts need to be smaller and refined to reduce the grain boundary inclusions. Tere needs to be more research performed to understand the minimum thickness steel castings can be cast in the lost foam process and if this thickness is alloy dependent. Chemistry analysis and metallography of the steel cast- ings via lost foam reveals little carbon pick up or degradation


October 2016 MODERN CASTING | 41


Fig. 11. This ASTM A743 grade CF8 stainless steel casting as-cast microstructure is shown with Oxalic acid etchant at 400X.


of microstructural properties. Based on the microstructural examination, it is expected that the mechanical and other material properties are the same as steel castings produced via other metalcasting techniques. However, additional test- ing is necessary to confirm this.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60