This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Windows Server 2003 Migration Reality Check


Some Questions to Ask as You Take Stock of Your Infrastructure


WRITTEN BY DAVE OLIVIER O


N July 14, 2015, Microsoft will stop releasing critical patches for Windows Server 2003.


Running unsupported software presents significant risks and complications for your business that will only increase in severity as time goes on. End of support for Windows Server


2003 can have a major impact on your business, so it’s important to take a server migration reality check. End of support means that Microsoft will no longer develop or release any updates for Windows Server 2003, and after support ends applications running on it will likely fail to meet compliance standards and regulations. The costs of maintaining legacy,


unsupported servers will likely skyrocket, and many enterprises may need to isolate the legacy servers to protect them with firewalls and intrusion detection systems from the latest cyber attacks since the servers will no longer receive any security updates. In fact, the U.S. Department of


Homeland Security’s Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT) recently issued an alert warning about the exposure to elevated risks of using Windows Server 2003 after the end of support that encouraged migration to supported operating systems or cloud-based services. Redmond Magazine reports that the


global installed base of Windows Server 2003 is approximately 24 million; half


of the installations virtual and half on physical servers. As Microsoft’s deadline for ending Windows Server 2003 support looms, some enterprise professionals may be overwhelmed by the complexities of a major migration. As you wrestle with developing a


migration process, it’s important to make a Windows Server 2003 migration reality check to discover, assess, and target workloads and software. To help clarify migration goals and planning, Intel suggests enterprises ask specific questions of your IT partners and ISVs. By asking the right questions, you


can gain a clear understanding of the hardware and software challenges your organization faces as the end of support deadline approaches. Intel® offers 10 clear questions that can help you structure your migration and determine whether you should migrate workloads to Windows Server 2012 R2 or the Microsoft Azure cloud platform.


Migrate and Save


Organizations who migrate to Windows Server 2012 R2 can save up $1 million per year1 Retire old servers, reduce management costs, and integrate new services, such as


cloud, more quickly when you migrate from Windows Server 2003. Get started with our assessment tool to help find the right upgrade path for your unique environment, applications, and workloads.


Visit www.pcconnection.com/WindowsServerEOS to get started. 1 The Total Economic Impact™ Of Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2. Forrester Research, Inc.


6 WWW.PCCONNECTION.COM 1.800.800.0014 IMAGES © WOWOMNOM / FOTOLIA The questionnaire* includes notes on


why you need answers to each question, and it includes a link to a free tool to help you model your server upgrades using a server refresh savings estimator. Migrating away from Windows


Server 2003 is an investment in your organization’s future. The timeframe is locked in place, so taking a migration reality check now is the best answer for making sure your organization is prepared for the harsh reality that is going to happen in July.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dave Olivier is a Program Manager for Intel at PC Connection with more than 10 years of experience in the areas of data center solutions, the cloud, and mobility. Discover more of Olivier ’s insights on PC Connection’s official blog, Connected, at www.pcconnection.com/blog


*See http://itcenterconnect.intel.com/ article/10-questions-ask-partner-migrating- windows-server-2003/ for more information.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36