understandingser nd By Vítor Westhelle deeper nd
Legend has it that the Augustinian friar Martin Luther, professor at the University of Wittenberg (Germany), nailed to the Castle Church door 95 theses for a dispute on the power of indulgences. The gesture was, at that time, a common practice of the academic community to engage a public debate. Only in retrospect did it assume the historical magnitude it received.
The theses were momentous in awakening dormant crises that people were living through and off ered pathways out of them. The theological battle cry was justifi cation by grace through faith, which had concrete consequences. And because of these consequences, Luther’s gesture led not only to an academic debate, as the 95 Theses had initially intended, but a reshaping, a re-formation, of the very social fabric. Although the Reformation had many other actors, Oct. 31, 1517, became a symbolic day and Luther became a fi gure larger than life.
The celebrated nailing of the 95 Theses marks the Reformation more for uplifting the principle of God’s free grace and its eff ectiveness than for the emblematic theatrical gesture. This theological principle cut into three fronts. Each addressed anthropological and sociological dimensions of a human existence in shambles and ready to burst. The nailing of the theses, with its message that God’s grace is not for sale, was the trigger. Justifi cation by grace alone morphed from a teaching into a transformative practice that transcended the main characters of the Reformation, including Luther.
A world-changing movement on three fronts The political front came to the fore early in the Peasant Revolt (1525), which was subsequently suppressed. The uprising was a powerful civic rebellion inspired by the incipient Reformation movement. Drafted by reformers, the “Twelve Articles,” a document that presented the peasants’
44 SEPTEMBER 2016
Series editor’s note: This month, on the cusp of the 500th anniversary, we begin a yearlong series on themes related to the Reformation. In this column, Professor Vítor Westhelle off ers a marvelous response to the news reporters’ “fi ve Ws.” —Michael Cooper-White, president of the Lutheran Theological Seminary at Gettysburg (Pa.).
Who, what, where, when and why?
pleas, starts with the Reformation’s resolve to rely solely on the word of God, trusting in God’s grace, and then moves to make concrete demands concerning the life of the people—access to common land for hunting, fi shing, collecting wood, the demands for fair taxes and rents, and for the abolition of the “death clause” (a widow losing entitlement to her husband’s land). The peasants cried for a vital space in a late feudal society.
Luther, who was fi rst called upon by the peasants as an advocate to their cause, later supported the repression launched against them. The time had not yet come for them. But some of the peasants’ demands would fi nd their way into the American “Declaration of Independence” (1776), the French Revolution (1789), and fi nally were comprehensively addressed in the 1848-49 revolution in German states.
A second front of the Reformation movement was connected with the emergence of fi nancial capitalism and the practice of usury. Luther, Philipp Melanchthon, John Calvin and the other reformers’ opposition to the practice were on theological grounds. Usury extorted nature and labor that were free gifts of God to all. Indulgences were to the church what usury was to the economy: an idol that robbed labor and drained life. Here the reformers’ and, in particular, Luther’s voice in defense of the created goodness of the economic order built on labor is vigorously upheld against the usurer’s monetary exploitation.
These two fronts are complemented by a third one, in which the Reformation was most successful and Luther had a particularly important role to play in reshaping the most powerful institution of the time. He was foremost the reformer of the church in its earthly (!) task of being an instrument of the word of God in both its vocal (proclamation) and visible (sacraments) forms, providing a space for the pure reception of the word of grace.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52