yourviews
VANT LEADERSHIP SERVANT LEADERSHIP
DECEMBER 2015 $4.75 ANT LEADERSHIP
RVANT LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP ANT LEADERSHIP
SERVANT LEADERSHIP SERVANT LEADERSHIP NT LEADERSHIP SERVANT LEADERSHIP SERVANT LEADERSHIP
MILITARY OFFICER
THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF MOAA | NEVER STOP SERVING®
WWW.MOAA.ORG
LEADERSHIP SERVANT LEADERSHIP
SERVANT LEADERSHIP
SERVANT LEADERSHIP SERVANT LEADERSHIP
SERVANT LEADERSHIP S SERVANT LEADERSHIP
SERVANT LEADERSHIP SERV MOAA President Vice
at the HelmYears SERVANT LEADERSHIP
Adm. Norbert R. Ryan Jr., USN (Ret), departs after a dynamic run 58
SERVANT LEADERSHIP SERVANT LEADERSHIP
13
President Vice Adm. Norbert R. Ryan Jr., USN (Ret),] can well take personal
“
[Former MOAA
‘that the most satisfying part is who we serve.’
pride in … his justifiable expression
— Cmdr. Kevin D. Harty, USN (Ret)
”
SERVANT LEADERSHIP SERVANT LEADERSHIP
SERVANT LEADERSHIP SERVANT LEADERSHIP
SERVANT LEADERSHIP SERVANT LEADERSHIP
SERVANT LEADERSHIP SERVANT LEADERSHIP
Leadership Appreciation I just had to express my sincere admira- tion for the wonderful, successful 13-year term of [former MOAA President Vice Adm. Norbert R. Ryan Jr., USN (Ret), pro- fi led in “Legacy of Leadership,” December 2015]. He can well take personal pride in his long and huge success and his justifi - able expression “that the most satisfying part is who we serve.” — Cmdr. Kevin D. Harty, USN (Ret)
Life Member, Lake & Sumter Counties (Fla.) Chapter via email
Benefits and Congress [Lt. Col. Donald Kaag, USA (Ret), “Benefi t Erosion,” Your Views, December 2015] is right on. Over the years, I have written and emailed my congressional representatives to enlist their support for legislation supported by MOAA. Rarely is there a response, and that is usually just a reply that my input is valued but that I should rest assured that Congress is very busy doing the nation’s work. Even those few in Congress who have had some military service seem to neglect those serving or who have served. … We truly have no real support in Congress or this administration. — Capt. Joe Sharpe, USN (Ret)
Life Member, Charleston (S.C.) Chapter via email
Lieutenant Colonel Kaag, after bemoaning military pay and benefi t cuts, closes his letter by asserting civilians have had their benefi ts untouched. Nothing could be fur- ther from the truth. Pay: Civilian pay has been completely
frozen many recent years and, when they do get a raise at all, it’s been the same or less than the military raise. The “seques- ter furlough” a couple years ago resulted in an almost 3-percent pay cut that year,
16 MILITARY OFFICER FEBRUARY 2016
essentially off setting all pay raises for the past fi ve-plus years. Health benefi ts: Civilian premiums, deductibles, and copayments change every single year, almost always for the worse. Retirement: The civil service retire-
ment system changed nearly 30 years ago to 1 percent per year served, with a 5-per- cent penalty for each and every year of “early” retirement, with no COLAs what- soever until age 62 (and no “catch up” even then), and then only partial COLAs even after age 62. For those few who might benefi t from the Special Retire- ment Supplement (SRS), it only lasts until age 62, there are no COLAs whatsoever, and any earnings from a post-retirement job reduce the SRS. I am not arguing that civilian benefi ts should be on par with military benefi ts. And I support Kaag’s right to argue for more military benefi ts or fewer reduc- tions. But he can’t argue that civilian pay and benefi ts have remained untouched. Retirement benefi ts were substantially reduced three decades ago, and other ci- vilian benefi ts are “touched” every year. Arguments to the contrary, like the many other Internet arguments about supposed congressional pensions and health ben- efi ts, are urban myths. — Capt. Glenn C. Powers, USN (Ret) Life Member via email
Financial Correction I’m neither a [certifi ed public accoun- tant] nor a [certifi ed fi nancial planner], but it didn’t take me long to spot two glaring fi nancial errors in [the December 2015] Military Offi cer. 1. In Washington Scene, “Major Part
B Spikes Reduced,” … “The 2016 income thresholds are based on the adjusted gross income from your 2014 federal tax return.” This is not correct. Medicare
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88