This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Oops. As any San Francisco


political observer will recognize, that sentence likely explains the 31-year gap between the Fleming’s design and ultimate construction. While the Great Depression and World War II certainly contributed to the delay, The City always struggles with competing interests and needs. The practice fairways are distinctly


visible on a 1938 aerial of the property, and were clearly well used. “It was a


The par-30 layout is a civic treasure, with modest green fees and a fast pace of play, measuring more than 2,015 yards.


place where guys like Ken Venturi used to go to beat balls,” says Links. “Venturi told me he used to go there all the time while his Dad was mind- ing the store, literally, since he ran the pro shop at Harding for years.” Links has also pored through


decades of Parks & Recreation minutes, but could not find a men- tion of MacKenzie or the expansion, which evidently commenced during a late 1950s remodel of Harding. With a long career in course con- struction, Jack Fleming had worked on several MacKenzie designs, including Cypress Point and the Meadow Club. He also designed, built or remodeled about 60 courses in Northern California. His legacy also had a fierce advocate in his son, John Fleming, a long-time superin- tendent at Olympic Club. In fact, while the younger Flem-


ing presided over the preparation of Olympic for the 1998 U.S. Open, Harding served as its parking lot, a nadir in the condition of the muni. Thanks to a crusade led by San Francisco attorney and former USGA president Frank “Sandy” Tatum, Harding and the Fleming 9 were restored in the early 2000s, through a $16 million renovation directed by former PGA Tour ar- chitect Chris Gray. Today known as TPC Harding Park, the course has


special rates for locals, most evident at the Fleming. Resident juniors pay only $13 per round; on weekends, non-residents pay the top rate of $33. (Youth on Course members can play during the week for as little as $12.) MacKenzie’s influence—whether


through his relationship with Flem- ing, or through those original plans he sketched 30 years earlier—appears to be alive and well at the nine-hole course. MacKenzie’s understanding of camouflage, learned during the Boer War, developed in World War I and applied to course design, is evident in the way mounds and natural dips trick the eye’s estimation of distance. For instance, the front-right bunker on the 425-yard seventh hole rises up 25 yards ahead of a well-contoured green, making the target appear closer than the true yardage. No. 7 is the most


MacKenzie-like hole on the nine. Other greens lack the dramatic


undulation of Cypress Point and Pasatiempo. “But the course demands strategy in several holes,” says Links, “where you need to stay on one side of the fairway if you want the best approach, which is very MacKenzie. So is the overall feel, since he was big on visual beauty.” The fairways of Harding flank most of the Fleming’s, and like the nearby Olympic and San Francisco golf clubs, are lined with cypress and Monterey pines, landscape DNA that’s among the most esteemed in golf. On a recent Tuesday morning, a pair of golf- ers finished the modest course in an unhurried hour and ten minutes. Time, and the genetics of great golf course design, clearly could not converge in a better place than the Fleming 9.


Special i zing in


Workers ’ Compensat ion Property & Casual ty


Advanced Claims Service Bi l ingual Loss Cont rol Employee Benef i ts


S e r v i n g c l u b s ’ n e e d s s i n c e 1 9 8 7


Pat Hoffman 


Keith Schuler


Tony Pozas  Tom Hughes 8 0 0 - 8 7 3 - 3 7 2 5


Of f i c e s t h r o u g h o u t Ca l i f o r n i a License #0B01094 Let our experi ce guie you en d WINTER 2016 / NCGA.ORG / 21


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120