search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The new age of


David Yipp, of OFC, provides a timely update on


the HPC processor market I


BM’s POWER8 systems seem to be gaining some traction, especially with interest in the new Minsky platform, specifically the NVlink performance and


integration into the system. Accelerator-based computation is


progressively seen as a way of increasing HPC performance for a wider variety of jobs, e.g. CFD, deep learning, AI, life sciences etc. Previously, the range of jobs was limited, but now it seems to be opening up, as research and experience in these ‘new’ technologies matures.


So is this the dawning of a new age? Te daddy of the accelerators is clearly the GPU. Nvidia did a great job of creating an ecosystem for development and its marketing campaign has been relentless (sorry, I don’t discount AMD; however, the adoption of CUDA over OpenCL has been a factor). Te Xeon Phi, the other mainstream accelerator coming from Intel, is arguably less successful in adoption. However, that might be changing. Intel’s Knights Landing (KNL), Intel’s


latest generation of Xeon Phi, is slowly but surely rolling out now, moving to a self-hosting system initially and becoming available in a more familiar add-in card form factor later. Similar to Nvidia, there is a flavour of the chip, the ‘F’ variant, that includes the interconnect on die, similar but more integrated into the system. Arguably, the Intel Scalable System framework of which KNL and Omni-path are parts of the same jigsaw, offers a more complete solution than the Nvidia offering. Tis is always going to be a David and Goliath story – an Nvidia, OpenPOWER


28 SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING WORLD @scwmagazine l www.scientific-computing.com


Foundation et al and Intel story. Tere are always going to be pros and cons for each camp. Nvidia has done a great job of supporting CUDA over the last decade. Yes you read that correctly; CUDA has been around for nearly 10 years! Tey have created an ecosystem of support, research and development that they should be proud of; the teaching centres, research institutions and GPU centres, building on the base of GeForce gaming cards. Every gamer on the planet who has an


Nvidia graphics card has access to HPC resources that, 20 years ago, could only be


Aquarius


fulfilled by field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). Intel, on the other hand, has an ecosystem that practically all mainstream programmers have used – Intel compiler tools. Intel has been intelligent enough to reuse this vast array of experience and building upon the x86 legacy in KNL, programmers already familiar with (specifically) HPC have less of a ‘journey’ in programming for the KNL system. Intel can bridge the gap, by providing the


complete ecosystem for HPC – this is what they are doing; however, they need to do more in developing the momentum behind


Atya/Shutterstock.com


Sashkin/Shutterstock.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32