search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FEATURE MATERIALS IN DESIGN & PROTOTYPING


Future forecast: four 3D printing predictions for the months ahead


This year is already proving to be a busy year for 3D printing. Mark Tyrtania, of Laser Lines, believes the upcoming months will be filled with opportunity for the industry and end users alike. Here are his predictions


1. NEW MID-RANGE HARDWARE It is no secret that last year was a challenging one for 3D printing, but things are looking up for 2017. Manufacturers can only release so many products every 12 months, and last year the focus was on rolling out a revamped range of entry-level MakerBots, and bedding in Stratasys’ flagship J750, a full-colour printer. The latter turned the industry on its head and - as the first printer capable of outputting more than 360,000 colours natively - it has taken users’ expectations to the next level. This year, the focus will fall between these two markets, since re-revving the same product areas would be needless duplication and would do little to bring new users to the market. Speed increments are always welcome and, with faster processors and key components now on stream, it would be realistic to expect improvements here. Whether we see prices falling in sync is open to question, particularly with the global economy in a state of flux and showing no signs of improving any time soon. However, with the tech behind 3D printing starting to mature, we can hope to see manufacturers at least thinking about ways to reduce costs with a view to attracting upgrades from entry-level users and bringing a whole new audience to the platform.


2. A FRESH FILE FORMAT STL - the format that has served the industry well for so long - is on its way out. It will not disappear in 2017, but by 2020 we can expect it to be a legacy format supporting hobbyists and older machines. In its place will be GrabCAD Print, which should go mainstream over the next 12 months. GrabCAD, the company behind the eponymous software and format, was established as a community for 3D designers who wanted to collaborate. Before long, it was developing its own applications, and it now ships both GrabCAD Workbench, its core collaboration product, and GrabCAD


20 MAY 2017 | DESIGN SOLUTIONS


Print, the software hotly tipped for 2017. GrabCAD Print marks a fundamental shift in the 3D workflow, which until now has required designers to translate their work from the original CAD to STL format before the printer can use it. GrabCAD’s native file format cuts out this intermediate step, allowing the software to address the 3D printing hardware directly. It integrates other functions too, like repair and packaging, which would previously have required some manual wrangling, using a third application like Materialise Magics. Aside from the simplified workflow, the


move to GrabCAD will give us all more meaningful interfaces and a unified working environment, which is likely to be adopted across the board sooner rather than later. The GrabCAD development team has not been working in isolation, but building alliances with the biggest names in 3D printing, giving it the potential to be an industry standard within three to four years.


3. NOVEL MATERIALS All the hardware and software in the world are useless without materials, and while they might not be headline- grabbers, there are innovations aplenty primed for release in 2017. Stratasys is rolling out soluble material support across its entire PolyJet range, including printers designed for desktop use. This kind of material is used during the printing process to support otherwise overhanging parts, and it washes away once the model is complete, leaving just the finished object behind. It is a far neater, quicker and less painstaking option than relying on designers to snap off and sand down the parts they don’t need. This coincides


with the release of a newly announced material called





SR35. This dissolves more quickly than existing options to significantly shorten the overall production time. Other permanent materials currently


coming on-stream (such as Nylon 6) are stronger and more durable, so they can be used for the small-scale production of finished parts or for more accurate test printing during an iterative development process.


4. A GRAND ENTRANCE Finally, this could be the year that we welcome a new player to the 3D printing arena. Hewlett Packard (HP) has been making a lot of noise about Jet Fusion, its own take on the additive production process. HP’s demoed some impressive development machines at trade shows throughout 2016. It has also hired people with key industry experience to develop, market and sell the technology. Its reseller network is ready to go. If it achieves all that it claims, then it is likely to attract a whole new user base. All it needs now is a finished product. HP cannot afford to take a high-profile


gamble like this and fail, which is no doubt why, compared to some of its rivals, it is pouring a lot of money into the project. The trouble is, for a company of HP’s size, its apparent bottom line still does not represent a particularly significant investment. Perhaps it hasn’t fully grasped the difference between 2D printing – where it excels – and the complexities of the third dimension, which it is only now starting to address.


Metal 3D printed race car


Laser Lines 3dprinting.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44