search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Dr Ian Hesketh is a serving police oficer, working as a senior policy adviser at the College of Policing. He is a Member of SET. Emma Williams is the deputy director of the Canterbury Christ Church University Policing Research Centre.


as being potentially at odds with prescriptive policing approaches and checklists. In discussing any move to a national


qualifications framework, we also need to look at the outputs of current research into policing and crime, and the ways in which much of this research is carried out.


FEELING EXCLUDED Research in Australia, on the impact of oficers being educated to degree level and beyond, found that unless oficers form part of any research undertaken, they are unlikely to adopt the resulting findings. This chimes with research conducted


by the College of Policing which found that, if oficers do not feel involved in processes of change, they are unlikely to buy into it or sign up to their organisations’ priorities to drive that change forward. Research into policing and crime in


the UK is rather fragmented currently. It is carried out by academics in universities and colleges and, occasionally, by oficers and staff on specialist courses. Some research takes a very scientific approach, tending to think about problems in a sterile way. For example, if a tactic is deployed in area A and not in similar area B, does crime reduce in A but not in B? Rarely does this type


of research consider the voice of the practitioner, or add any context


to the results they glean. As a result, oficers report feeling uninvolved and that, as a profession, things are done to the police in a way that tends to undermine their developing sense of professionalism. Research based solely, or even


largely, on data analysis is simply not good enough and, of course, it impacts on the way in which the police forces educate and train their oficers and staff. Such research can reduce policing


to a series of overly simplified, crime- control models. It is the antithesis of the more sophisticated, evidence- based policing practice that the College of Policing and many police oficers know is required to meet today’s challenges. Policing scholars are there as


educators to encourage debate, ask the dificult questions, try new creative ideas, consider the information available from a variety of sources, including police oficers, and to question the validity of that data. Academics should encourage


oficers to ask research questions and consider the most effective research methodology to help address the questions raised. The PEQF is key to developing and recognising truly professionalised


policing in England and


Wales. This is a long, and contested, journey for those involved in police education, but one which ought to reap just rewards for both the police and the public they serve.


THEBIG IDEA


Mary Kitchener outlines the key attributes and uses of the oft-cited but, perhaps, less well understood Bloom’s Taxonomy


Created by Educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom and peers in 1956, ‘Bloom’s Taxonomy’ is one of the most widely applied ‘go to’ strategies to transform learning goals into easuable obecties o eectie lesson planning.


The essential points are:


• There are actually three taxonomies: cognitie knoledge, aectie alues and attitudes) and sensory (skills). Which one is chosen depends on the original learning goal.


 o tis, a taono o classification divides six hierarchical categories of learning, from simple to complex and concrete to abstract thinking, into learning objectives.


• As a general rule, students must achieve the prior learning objective before they proceed to a more complex level of learning. For example, they must be able to ‘identify’ before they can ‘apply’.


• Applying Bloom’s Taxonomy to learning objectives ensures they are measurable for assessment.


• Assessing the objectives gives feedback on the learning process to teacher and learner. In 2001, Bloom’s Taxonomy was revised by Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl to eect st centu educatos and learners. “Comprehension” was changed to “understanding” and “synthesis” developed into “creating”. For over 50 years, Bloom’s Taxonomy


has resisted the waxing and waning of educational fashions. While there are critics of the process, it serves as a simple method to align goal, objective and assessment.


Mary Kitchener is an educational consultant at the Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, and is a Member of SET.


The College of Policing is due to publish further information on ualifications late tis ea o ute details and uestions please contact PolicingEQF@college.pnn.police.uk


INTUITION ISSUE 27 • SPRING 2017 17


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36