search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE MOJO INNOVATORS PODCAST


Mojo magazine entered the podcast space for the fi rst time last month. Here editor John Mulvey outlines their success so far, and their ambitions going forward…


How did Mojo’s podcast come about? John Mulvey: “I guess like most magazines, it’s something we’ve talked about for ages, but we didn’t want to rush it: it felt more important to wait until we came up with a good idea, and a good format, and then do it properly. I think there’s always demand for decent podcasts that don’t patronise their audience, so producing thoughtful, entertaining, evergreen content about the most significant artists of the past 50/60 years would be worth putting out there.”


Does the podcast have a different purpose to the magazine? “We’ve devised the format to complement the magazine rather than compete with it. If fans of David Bowie, Brian Wilson and Kate Bush discover us via the podcast, that’d be great. But it’d be crazy to mount this kind of project purely in terms of brand awareness. We know there’s a huge international audience for what Mojo does, who share our tastes and values, and who’d like to hear from us more frequently. Hopefully Mojo Innovators does that job, too.”


Is there anything you personally feel the Mojo podcast can offer that other brands can’t?


“The idea isn’t that different from what we do in the magazine each month: use our unrivalled knowledge and storytelling skills to find fresh insights on the greatest artists. We really wanted to avoid contrarianism and shock provocations to manufacture conflict; that sort of strategy feels kind of trashy and immature for our audience. I think we’re showing how Jenny Bulley, our associate editor, and a small bunch of writers, who all carry their expertise lightly, can celebrate these heroes without recourse to cliché and predictability.”


Will there be room for artist interviews in the future? “We’ll see how it goes. We’ve got a long list of artists who’d make brilliant subjects, and a load of


Working their Mojo: (L-R)


Mojo’s Pat Gilbert, Mark Blake, John Mulvey and Jenny Bulley


writers who have interesting things to say about them. I wouldn’t like to speculate too much on how it evolves.”


It’s still very early days, but what kind of impact has the podcast had since starting last month?


“Really good, given that we only launched on June 6. We’ve had extremely positive feedback from listeners and, at time of writing, we’re No.1 in the iTunes Music Podcasts chart and in first place on their New & Noteworthy list. I think there’s massive potential for growth: our audience is increasingly comfortable with drawing on a wider and wider range of information sources that complement each other through the day rather than clash, and podcast listening can often be quite an intimate, companionable experience that isn’t quite the same as other media. I see the landscape as an analogue to the way Mojo’s audience consume music now: they’re not focused on just vinyl, or CDs, or streaming – they understand that all these different delivery mechanisms have a useful place in their lives.”


SOMEONE WHO ISN’T ME (SWIM PODCAST)


You may know Daniel P Carter as the host of the BBC Radio 1 Rock Show, but since 2016 he has been producing his very own podcast, one in which he interviews (and paints!) some of the biggest names in rock and beyond...


You already have the Radio 1 Rock show, so why start the SWIM podcast? Daniel P Carter: “Basically the goal with Someone Who Isn’t Me was to be able to sit down with artists I really respected and ask them, not just about their latest album or book or whatever, but to have a long conversation about the creative process and more often than not, what that implies from a wider viewpoint. I think people really want to hear the artists they like speaking honestly about things they might not always get to talk about. Podcasts are so important because they can be as niche as you like, but they will always find their audience and, as we’ve seen, those audiences can be huge. People want long form conversations on some really obscure stuff that goes past the first few layers. Which gives me hope. I’ve learned, regardless of how niche things can get, there are a ton of people that will be interested in listening to it. Having conversations with artists outside of the usual remit, especially when they are on a press junket, can be the best interviews they’ll do as well and people definitely respond to that. Also I don’t see any other podcasters painting portraits of their guests for the episode covers. What a stupid idea that was to start with! Making oil paintings of each person that comes on is a nightmare, as that generally takes 10 times longer than the conversations themselves, but, I’ve started now and it’s another one of the things that sets it apart!”


What else sets your podcast apart from some of the others out there?


“Well, I think I’m able to have very open and frank discussions with a lot of the artists about art, music, mysticism and whatnot, which generally doesn’t all get covered in one place. More often than not, most ‘music’ podcasts don’t ask about creativity and how that isn’t always a solely internal process. I already have an inkling that a lot of the people I ask on will be happy to go off on slightly more esoteric or metaphysical tangents and the ones that are a bit more reluctant can be coerced into it by me being open about a lot of that stuff, how I relate to it and how previous guests feel about it, so they aren’t left feeling like they’re going out on a limb to discuss it.”


What are you particularly proud of in terms of the content you’ve put out so far?


“The podcast I think that’s resonated the most with a lot of


people is the one I did with Dan Searle from Architects. We did it six months after his twin brother and Architects guitarist, Tom, had passed away from cancer at 28. The band were about to embark on their first run of US shows since his passing and Dan was getting asked by a lot of magazines to speak about the situation for the band and about Tom’s passing. He actually contacted me and asked if he could come on the podcast to discuss all of it so that it would all be there in one place and that way he wouldn’t have to keep talking about it with publications. It was a weird one to be asked, as it wasn’t something I would have asked him to do myself. So for him to decide that SWIM was the platform he’d like to do that on was quite humbling. That’s still the most powerful episode that there’s been. The episode with Marilyn Manson is still one of my favourites. We did that at his house one night. We get on really well and I think that showed in the conversation, a lot of his fanbase said it was one of his most open interviews, which makes me feel like it was a success. When I first started Someone Who Isn’t Me, I made a wishlist of people I’d like to speak to and I’m slowly working my way through it. The ones I’d still really like to cross off the list include Robert Smith, Nick Cave, Grant Morrison and Peter Levenda.”


Are you pleased with the reaction to everything so far?


Get Carter: Daniel P Carter and (inset) his


portrait of recent SWIM guest Fat Mike of NOFX


“As far as impact goes, I’ve had artists hit me up asking if they can come on and record an episode, so I guess its getting somewhere. As far as figures go, I know its reach and effect is pretty decent. When I first reached a quarter of a million downloads, I knew it was starting to do its job…”


musicweek.com


01.07.19 Music Week | 23


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104