12 • Aug. 28 - Sept. 10, 2015 • The Log
Commission approves Statewide sea level rise policy guidance
Coastal leaders hope non- regulatory document provides flexibility.
By Parimal M. Rohit
CHULA VISTA — Climate change earned another acknowledgement this month as the California Coastal Commission unanimously approved on Aug. 12 a policy guidance docu- ment to address sea level rise up and down the state’s coast. The commission formally approved
a comprehensive document officially referred to as “Sea Level Rise Policy Guidance: Interpretive Guidelines for Addressing Sea Level Rise in Local Coastal Programs and Coastal Development Permits.” Coastal Commission Executive
Director Charles Lester said sea level rise could happen soon or occur much later, but adopting a policy guidance document would help keep options open and help local and state leaders to adapt to any future event. “What we do now with documents like this and our plans in this decade is really going to set the choices for future generations,” Lester said. “We’re going to be thinking about the options we have now in ways that will deter- mine what we can do later, 10, 20, 50, 100 years from now.” State officials and commission staff spent nearly two years crafting the pol- icy guidance document, which falls short of being a regulatory scheme but instead aims to provide government agencies with recommendations of how best to address potential sea level rise. Commissioner Mary Shallenberger said the document is not cookie cutter and provides city governments with flexibility. “Local governments really are given
a great deal of flexibility in here. Everything in this guidance [advocates
A sea level rise policy guidance document was recently approved by the California Coastal Commission. The document aims to provide coastal communities with tools to address predicted sea level rise. Communities such as Newport Beach, where a portion of Balboa Island was once flooded during a strong storm, have already been crafting sea level rise policies.
looking] at what’s on the ground, then applying it to the specifics of what you have on your particular coast,” Shallenberger said. “This guidance has been prepared to assist planners and project appli- cants in understanding and preparing for some of the far-reaching implica- tions of sea level rise. It does highlight the regulatory actions that may need to consider sea level rise and it offers suggestions for ways to incorporate sea level rise into planning and regulatory decisions, when needed,” commission staff stated in a report to commission- ers.
Carey Batha, a Sea Grant Extension
fellow with the Coastal Commission, said sea level rise, if realized, could have serious implications on coastal resources and communities with “a lower capacity to adapt.” “It’s widely recognized that plan-
ning now to minimize these impacts and protect coastal resources is criti- cal. Additional guidance from the state is needed to aid in the planning process at the local level,” Batha said. “Many local governments in California have already begun sea level rise adap- tation planning processes and are actively looking forward to a finalized
guidance from the commission.” NOAA Coastal Management Fellow
Kelsey Ducklow said the sea level rise guidelines recommend adaptive strate- gies on a case-by-case basis. “Adaptation strategies should be chosen on a case-by-case basis and location-specific basis … and accounts for local conditions. Different strate- gies will be applicable to different loca- tions,” Ducklow said. “The effective- ness of adaption strategies will likely vary across spatial and temporal scales. In many cases, a hybrid approach that uses multiple strategies may be necessary.”
The document includes guiding
principles of how to address sea level rise, a discussion of best available sci- ence, adaptive strategies and legal and technical information. Also included in the document are step-by-step instruc- tions of how local governments can address sea level rise in the Local Coastal Programs and the Coastal Development Permit process. Becky Smyth, the West Coast
regional director with NOAA’s Office of Coastal Management, said local com- munities would be able to rely upon the commission’s policy guidance to better address sea level rise. “A lot of local governments are look- ing for tools. The guidance [document] does a really good job of providing a really comprehensive [and] relevant list of tools,” Smyth told commission- ers.
There were some concerns with the policy guidance document. Don Schmitz, a land use attorney
who represents Newport Beach, told commissioners the proposed guidance policies of how to analyze sea level rise differ from how the Orange County municipality conducted its own stud- ies on the issue. Newport Beach, he said, spent three
years studying how to address the impacts of sea level rise along the city’s coastline and within the harbor. The city’s planned presentation of a policy proposal to the Coastal Commission
later this year could be jeopardized by the agency’s guidance document, Schmitz said. “The suggested, ascribed policies
and procedures for analyzing sea level [rise], which are in this guidance docu- ment, are new. They’re different. If we are going to be required to [follow the new procedures], then our entire LCP process is going to come to a screech- ing halt, which we would find discon- certing,” Schmitz told commissioners, adding he hoped the commission would work with Newport Beach to ensure the city could continue to develop its policy proposals. Commissioner Roberto Uranga said the policy guidance document should factor current projects into future plans and serve as a living document. Uranga specifically cited Avalon’s fuel pier dock as a project not consistent with policy guidance document but should be grandfathered into the com- mission’s plans. “Sometimes these guiding princi- ples might cross the line in terms of being regulatory. We need to look at how that is going to be affecting proj- ects already existing,” Uranga said. “If the existing project is there and doesn’t meet [the policy guidance document’s] standard, how is this document going to affect [the project]. Are we opening ourselves to future litigation?” Commission staff responded the policy guidance document provides recommendations of how to address sea level rise.
Another concern: How could the commission assist cities who do not have the funds to conduct studies or hire consultants to advise them of how to address sea level rise and imple- ment the policy guidance document’s recommendations? “It’s not our responsibility to worry about people’s pocketbook, but the reality is that there are a lot of small farms, there’s a lot of people who use the coast [who] aren’t equipped to be able to meet this [policy guidance doc- ument],” Commissioner Martha McClure said. “There are many local governments who are not going to be able to meet this, even with an LCP grant. I want to bring everyone for- ward with this.” Commission staff said they will continue to hold workshops and pub- lic meetings to help local governments craft sea level rise programs within the context of the policy guidance docu- ment. A Pacific Institute study predicts
California will experience up to 4.6 feet of sea level rise by 2100, placing about $100 billion worth of property at risk of coastal flooding. Commission staff cited reports claiming about 21 million people lived in the state’s coastal coun- ties as of 2014.
thelog.com
Photo by city of Newport Beach
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52