Technical
So, if you do not have a dedicated washpad - and a satisfactory means of disposing of or properly treating the washwater - you will technically be breaking the law
groups of substances which are toxic, persistent and liable to bioaccumulate, and other substances or groups of substances which give rise to an equivalent level of concern
These substances are washed off daily from every golf machine; oil, petrol, grease, diesel, etc. You should consider also The Control of Pollution (Oil Storage) (England) Regulations 2001 and, if in Scotland, the more stringent sister legislation. Most golf courses have a diesel tank near the machinery store. Is yours compliant? What happens if it is ruptured and contents spill? Why not incorporate space for your diesel tank and other possible pollutants on your washpad? So, if you do not have a dedicated washpad - one with a low kerb surround to contain all pollutants to ensure these reach the treatment/storage facility - and a satisfactory means of disposing of or properly treating the washwater, you will technically be breaking the law.
What are the options for compliance? Essentially, there are three choices:
Washdown Separator: Separators appear, initially, to be relatively inexpensive but are acceptable as a stand-alone solution only if they discharge to foul sewer. Unfortunately, for many greenkeeping facilities located away from the clubhouse, this usually is not an option unless you install, at extra expense, a large holding tank (with no outlet) for the separator to discharge into.
“
The holding tank contents (classed as hazardous waste, so costly) would need pumping out from a top manhole and, for safety, fitted with a high water level alarm. The other downside of a separator is that a) it needs pumping out regularly and b) being a discharge system, there are no water savings. You’d also need to buy and install a pressure washer or pump to produce worthwhile water washing pressure too! So, what originally seemed an inexpensive solution is not quite that.
One hundred percent of the cost of a system and installation can be offset against taxable profits under the ECA Scheme in the UK
Reed Beds: Also sometimes considered an inexpensive option, reed beds are ideal for sewage waste (organic matter), but do have severe limitations when handling hydrocarbons (oil, grease, fuel etc.). This would mean time consuming and costly maintenance and, of course, reed replacements. Space requirement would be large and again, there are no water savings.
Water Recycling System: A genuine biological water recycling system is the best and future- proof way to go, with the big advantage of saving thousands of litres of precious water. Independent water meter tests have demonstrated that a typical 18 hole course can save over half a million litres of water a year by recycling.
You can elect to install a below ground or ”
above ground system. Do make sure though that you do your homework thoroughly, checking that what is offered actually recycles! Some solutions may be, in essence, an overpriced separator solution. A system that is an approved water saving technology and on the WTL (Water Technology List) provides an extra bonus for those installing such a system too; one hundred percent of the cost of a system and installation can be offset against taxable profits under the ECA (Enhanced Capital Allowance Scheme) in the UK.
If you are considering a recycling system, look at what’s on offer (there’s very little choice of genuine biological recycling systems), make comparisons, do the sums (not only purchase costs, but running costs too) and select your preferred system. The best advice then is to talk to someone who has the system of your choice and, better still, go and see it in operation. If you need to deliberate further, go and see a competitor’s system in action. One interesting exercise of interest that may
influence you is this: A while ago, my company produced an analysis comparing the cost of operating a separator (legally) versus our own recycling system. Over a five year period, and taking water charges, EA and emptying fees into account for a typical separator, our system, with a typical saving of 500,000 litres of water a year, showed a saving of over £3,000! You may now have reached a decision on
your course of action and “how long have I got?” may be your next question. Sorry to say but, if you are not compliant with what has been set out in this article; your only hope is that you are not paid a compliance visit! Technically, everyone should have complied way back in 2009. You’d have no defence if you were caught polluting, as citing ignorance of the law of the land will not be acceptable. Let’s be honest, it’s difficult to imagine
anyone who has not seen the ongoing media coverage regarding pollution and legislative compliance over the last six years or more! You may think that you won’t be inspected, but it is on record that the Environment Agency does so. In fact, recent articles in the golf press have covered exactly that, with one instance of a golf club being advised that contaminated water from their washpad had entered a stream! They were advised to act quickly and did so, installing a ClearWater system and a package sewage plant. The EA do not have sufficient officers to inspect every single golf course on a regular basis, but who knows, the next inspection could be your club; not a problem though if you are compliant!
David Mears is joint MD of Highspeed Group Ltd., suppliers of the WTL approved ClearWater Washpad Water Recycling System, Separators, Sewage Plant, and Fuel, Oil and Water Tanks
www.highspeed.co.uk
PC FEBRUARY/MARCH 2016 I 125
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148