On leadership training, we asked: 30% 22% 23%
How satisfied are you with the amount of leadership training you have received in the Reserves?
11% 9% 5%
Very satisfied
Fairly satisfied
Neither
satisfied nor dissatisfied
Fairly dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Not applicable
For comparison, ResCAS reported that 46% were ‘Satisfied’, whilst 32% were ‘Neutral’ and 21% were ‘Dissatisfied’ with the amount of leadership training they had received.
These are some of the comments received:
Reserve officers have the opportunity to undertake a CST that is considered equivalent to their Regular peers, I am unaware of any plans/intent to develop a ‘Course’ such as the FCSP to prepare them for such Command as no significant training burden to prepare me for this job.
There has been a markable difference between the training as a Junior Rank and that of a Commissioning/ed officer. The commissioned training has appeared far more relevant and of a very high standard.
Professional Officer Training for part-time (PTVR) officers is non-existent for certain branches (Regiment, Logistics, Admin). To fill established Logs Officer posts on this squadron, I’m reliant on retired ex-Regulars. That’s not always satisfactory because not all ex-Regulars are suited to the exigencies of Reserve service.
The Reserves have invested more in training and development for me than my full time employer and much of it is transferable to my day job.
18
www.raf-ff.org.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56