This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Column BDA dispatches with Robert Kinloch


Stronger together


Robert Kinloch, deputy chair of the BDA’s Principal Executive Committee, says he has never seen the profession more united


A


s we ponder the challenges facing dentistry in Scotland in the year ahead, I make no apologies for focusing on the issue that gripped


dentists across the UK for the last six months of 2014 – culminating with the High Court ruling that the GDC had acted unlawfully on setting professionals fees. It was the news we had all been waiting


for, and I am really proud to have been on the BDA’s principal executive committee that agreed to launch this judicial review. But how can it be that although the GDC was deemed to have acted unlawfully, it was able to proceed with charging an outrageous ARF? In normal circumstances, the BDA, as


the successful claimant, could expect that having won its case, the ARF regulations would be quashed and dentists’ fee would revert back to £576. Only in very unusual circumstances would this not happen. The GDC’s lawyers argued that these


were such circumstances and that, there- fore, even though the BDA had won the legal argument, relief should not be granted, citing the risk of ‘administrative chaos’ if the fees were quashed. This argu- ment was rejected by our lawyers since the GDC was put on red alert by the BDA as far back as last July. It therefore had plenty of time to prepare alternative arrangements. While Justice Cranston declined to


reverse the fee, he was clearly troubled by the prospect of denying dentists their refund. So much so that he was at pains


to stress that: “This is not in any way a pyrrhic victory for the BDA. They won this case and they won it decisively.” The judge went on to say, however, that: “I am troubled that the GDC acts in the public interest and must do its job.” It was this public interest argument that appeared to sway his decision. Winning the battle but losing out on


the fees is disappointing – we would have preferred to see dentists have the correct fee set correctly. And the GDC might appear to have got away without having to do the right thing. But all’s not lost since a High Court judge


has joined the queue of people saying that the GDC has acted improperly. He is in the company of the BDA, the Professional Standards Authority and the UK Govern- ment Under-Secretary for Health Dr Dan Poulter MP. Collectively, all these voices paint a very grim picture of the GDC’s conduct. We are now asking the Westminster


Health Select Committee to look into this very seriously as well as Ministers and the Professional Standards Authority (the regulators’ regulator). The SDPC has already made its concerns about the GDC known to the Scottish Government and we can look further to see how Holyrood could support us in this matter. The conduct of the GDC with regard


to the ARF has had a considerable impact on the confidence of the profession in its regulator, and the GDC will have to take major steps to rebuild.


Scottish Dental magazine 23 While we may have been deprived of


the entire outcome one would reasonably expect from winning the legal battle, we would never have got this far without that unequivocal strength of feeling and the willingness of the BDA to fight for justice on our behalf. As a member of the BDA’s principal executive committee I strongly endorsed this action, and in my 37 years in dentistry I have never seen the profession so unified. Together we’ve proved that a ‘profes-


sional’ regulator has acted not simply unprofessionally, but unlawfully. We’ve proved that we really are stronger together.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84