downsmail.co.uk
brownfield sites in Kent, which could accommodate at least 70,000 homes. In Maidstone there are 89 hectares, with
336 in Tonbridge and Malling.Were this land to be developed for housing, and the many thousands of empty homes across the county brought back into residential use, the need to decimate huge areas of greenfield land for new homes would, in conjunction with brave political decisions to limit the regional population, be virtually removed. An achievement such as this would metaphorically move many more mountains than by simply digging up precious agricultural land that is valued greatly by local people, who are complaining only because they care about where they live. Democracy is a legacy of the many lives our servicemen have lost fighting wars. It is this form of government that helps
people stave off a dictatorial approach to running the country, which is what you would be left with if someone with “balls” decides to make decisions against the wishes of many.
Response by Stephen
Work with schools Dear Sir – In response to the bus companies’ complaints about varied school times, I think the buses would be even less reliable if the schools were all the same. There would need to be a lot more buses running at exactly the same time to accommodate all passengers. Even now, children are unable to sit for large parts of the journey and I know of several examples where children have been told they cannot get on a bus because it is full. My daughter’s bus has driven past her without stopping and is often so late that she has had to give up waiting and return home for a lift to school. Sometimes the buses are a lot earlier
than their stated time but they never wait at the stop until the time they should depart, so anyone who has not arrived early misses their bus. Instead of whining about the schools, the bus companies should be working with them to provide a public transport service that is reliable for all users. I don't think bus companies could cope
with the volume of passengers if all schools needed a bus at the same time. Jackie Dixon, by email
Staggered times safer
Dear Sir – Regarding the story in November’s Downs Mail, “School times should be same everywhere”, there are a few major concerns that Norman Kemp has not taken into consideration when he said that all schools should have the same finishing times. I have been a bus driver for 12 years,
also part of a union within the industry. Schools have always finished at different times for the health and safety of the employee and passengers. If all schools finished at the same time, the buses would become overloaded which would mean that passengers would be standing on the platform (front of the bus) which blocks the driver’s vision, making it unsafe to drive. If the schools all finished at the same time you would find children blocking
overcrowded bus stops and standing in the road, which would put them at risk of getting run down. I have written to Arriva, Maidstone Council, Tonbridge and Malling Council and MP Tracey Crouch in the past to ask if more buses could be provided to help children get home instead of them having to hang around the town centre. I live in Snodland and the bus service is
very poor for the number of people who live here. My daughter has only one bus to get her to school on time and if something goes wrong with that she is then late. She has to wait more than half an hour in town to get the bus home, which makes her day longer than most office workers. To conclude, for the safety of the children its best to keep the closing times of the schools different. SimonWickwar, by email
All on the road together
Dear Sir – It makes sense for all school times to be the same so that everybody knows where they stand. People travelling at school opening and closing times will then change their times if possible to avoid making the buses even more crowded. TonyWilson, Larkfield
Driving lessons needed
Dear Sir - I feel I must respond to B Brown’s revelation (Downs Mail, December) that the totally pointless traffic lights at the junction ofWillington Street and Madginford Road are necessary. First let me point out that I was merely agreeing with a previous writer on the subject and feel that she should have aimed her missive in that direction . I will concede the point on the pedestrian aspect being on demand, but take exception to the opinion that these lights are needed to allow traffic to emerge from Madginford Road safely. Everyone I know who has used this junction for the 27 years I have lived in the area has managed it without incident. To cite term time as an excuse when
everybody from national government downwards agrees that school runs should be discouraged rather than aided was a bit of a faux pas. Clogging up our schools with cars twice a day should be discouraged. The vast majority of traffic lights are put
in because a significant portion of the general public has a low skill set when it comes to driving so do find traffic lights of benefit. I suggest advanced lessons are in order
if a junction cannot be negotiated without the aid of pointless traffic lights. John Hartnup, by email
More space such a help
Dear Sir – I have just read the story about MP Helen Grant’s campaign to give pensioners more space to park. What a wonderful idea. I’d like to thank her for taking up the
plight of older folk who have problems with limited car parking spaces. I too need to be able to open the car door fully to be able to get in and out of
our car, and my husband needs to be able to open our car boot to get my walker out without being mown down by other drivers impatient to find a car parking space. We are the wrong side of 65 and would
not dream of using a disabled space because we appreciate that those who need to use a wheelchair or who have limited mobility need these allotted spaces, or parent and child spaces for those with children and their buggies. However this now means we are restricted on where we can visit due to our parking problems. The idea of dedicated wide parking
spaces offered by large retailers, supermarkets and local authority car parks would be wonderful and would make life so much easier for more mature folk.
Trisha Garrard, by email
Age no excuse when parking Dear Sir – I am heartily fed up with the abuse and withering looks I have suffered from pensioners as a disabled person of under 65 when I make use of my blue badge and park in a space they think is just for them. If they truly have a disability, they can apply for a blue badge. Wherever they live in the country, the
rules are the same and can easily be found on the KCC website for those living in Kent. As pensioners, they also have the luxury
of being able to shop at less busy times, and could park well away from other vehicles, if they need to have help getting in and out of their cars. Although this would mean they would have to walk just a little farther, if they do not qualify for a blue badge, it would mean they are physically able to do this. Those who have given me the looks for parking legally and rightfully, have then often tottered off on high heels, jogged into the nearest pub or gone into dance classes at nearby community centres, all of which have never been a possibility for me and others like me who have been disabled since birth or childhood. Jeanne Gibson, Birling Avenue, Bearsted
J8 link road needed
Dear Sir – I and many others believe something will get built at M20 Junction 8 eventually. It is better to discuss and benefit from it
than to lose out totally if an appeal is granted in the future. A link road for the area, unfortunately
not supported, would be positioned far enough away from villages and the argument for "putting off visitors to Leeds Castle" is utter nonsense.We need this road. Jenny Sutton,Willington Street
Christmas bazaar thanks
Thank you for publicising our Christmas bazaar which took place on Saturday, November 15. Thanks to the support of local people we managed to raise a grand total of £1,030, which was a fantastic result.We are very grateful. Ann Tutte, Maidstone Mencap
Maidstone Town Xmas 2014 33
Comment
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48