Implants


then inserted on to the pre-existing prosthesis (Figures ı0 and ıı). Once the modeling process was complete, the black caps, used for laboratory phases only, were replaced with the final caps choosing the proper retention (Figure ı2). Comparing the initial situation (no bar)


with the final result (with the inserted reinforcement bar –see Figure ı3), it was evident that, by performing an extremely simple procedure, a solid prosthesis with stability and very satisfactory aesthetic result was achieved. It was possible to bring the area of retention into the middle ridge, despite a clear vestibular emergence of the implants (Figures ı4 and ı5). The patient’s desire to maintain the


existing prosthesis was respected, with patient satisfaction being the primary objective of the work carried out. To achieve this, the best materials and products on the market were selected. Experience and communication with


the patient were both important in order to reach the expected result. As well as ideal treatment plans for the edentulous patient, there is an ideal treatment plan which is appropriate for ‘that’ individual partially edentulous patient.


Fig 13


Fig 14


Fig 15


Ireland’s Dental magazine 43


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52