to happen, although slowly and in niche areas.
the nature of the UK sector; it’s dynamic and driven and has to change continuously to keep up, and is an early adopter of technology to enhance service and the operational approach. The key now is to start taking these models abroad – this is starting
Technology and the utilisation of new concepts will see the UK continue to thrive abroad and continue to lead the field. Risk is the key reason for clients to buy in all sectors and any country and this will not change. It is then about educating the client base so they can truly understand their risks and the way these risks can be mitigated using technology, remote management and flexible resource.
The globe is shrinking in terms of the way we communicate and access information to manage clients’ accounts and locations. The
question will start to develop around standards and whether there could be standards that run across the sector from country to country.
My view is that this is some way off, but in some vertical sectors there is movement of ideals such as aviation standards or nuclear in terms of safety – the security sector as a whole is still far too siloed for standards to be set across the sector.
Bob Forsyth MD, Mitie’s Total Security Management Business
www.mitie.com
Securing the event D
ecades of tackling threats from home and abroad and notable success in
the handling of events, such as London 2012, has enabled the UK to add transport security for major events to the long list of security areas in which the country excels.
This expertise is now being spread to the rest of the world, with the 2014 Brazil World Cup showing that best practice in this area is being implemented in even the most difficult of locations and scenarios.
Other than the odd story of private security firms failing to turn up or turning up late, by and large this was a successful example of major events security. This was all in stark contrast to the flood of negativity running up to the event, where there were concerns throughout the football world about security for the millions of fans visiting and the thousands of players and staff.
And no one could accuse the Brazilian authorities of being ill-prepared or ill- equipped in the run up to the tournament, with some $900 million spent on security. Compare this to the last World Cup in 2010 in the equally problematic South Africa, where its government set aside $150 million for security with some $70 million spent on deploying 31,000 extra police for the event and $65 million on crowd control equipment, helicopters and water cannons etc.
At London 2012, the British government budgeted a similar figure to the Brazil World Cup figure of £553 million ($890 million) on securing the capital, plus £475 million ($760
© CI TY S ECURI TY MAGAZ INE – AUTUMN 2014
million) for army, security services and additional police spending.
However, the way that domestic police forces are being utilised at major events is being rethought. Former Director of Public Security for the Association of Police and Public Security Suppliers (APPSS) Bob Rose believes circumstances are bringing a change to the handling of major events.
He explains, “It is widely anticipated that there are further public sector spending cuts to come. These budget reductions have made police forces focus on becoming more efficient and, although not directly linked to major event policing, the reduction in real terms of officers on a day-to-day basis means that there are fewer officers and staff available for other policing activities. Of course some costs are recovered from event organisers; however, I am in no doubt that it is becoming more and more difficult for police forces to carry out the policing of major events without any impact on 'day-to- day' policing.”
One of the key time-consuming aspects of handling major events security is the remarkable amount of pre-planning. Quite apart from the day-to-day pressure on police when the event is underway, there has always been months, sometimes years, of planning prior to things getting underway.
Interestingly, the massive show of force from police, private security and military personnel at the World Cup did cause many to question whether it was all a bit too much. Rose comments, “Sometimes it is difficult to get
www. c i t y s e cur i t yma ga z ine . com
the balance right. Are there enough private security personnel to 'police' the event? Is there the need to supplement private security with police and military? The difficulty is that this is a major sporting event and risks come with such an event. It was obvious to me with the Brazil World Cup that there was the necessity to use military personnel and equipment to support the security of the event even though this overt show of strength could appear at times to be seen as overkill.”
Major events have never been in greater proliferation throughout the globe, as traditional regular events such as the Olympics, football tournaments and music festivals are being supplemented by new events. In many areas, these are being implemented as a catalyst for economic growth.
The increase in major events is also speeding up the evolution of how they are kept secure and safe. In response to this, the first ever conference on Major Events Transport Security has been added to the programme at the annual Transport Security Expo (TRS) 2014. The conference will look at lessons from the past, actions for the present and what the future of major events transport security will hold.
Transport Security Expo 2-3 December 2014 at Olympia, London
Bruce Ackland Transport Security Expo
www.transec.com
> 21
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36