This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Technical


Infiltrometer working on the 2nd green


that the top surface was firming up, and that waterlogged greens were a thing of the past, but I wanted data. The Infiltrometer uses the double ring system. It has a ball resting on the top and a gauge that measures the downward movement of water in mm/hr. I test the percolation rates every month in three positions on the green. Before I begin, I saturate the rootzone for at least ten minutes to make sure I get a ‘true’ saturated reading. These are the average annual results:


- 2010 - 31mm/hr - 2011 - 28mm/hr - 2012 - 39mm/hr


As you can see, there was a slight dip last year, but improvement was vast this year, even with the greens being pretty much saturated due to heavy rainfall. It will be interesting to see whether the trend continues.


Compaction


I test compaction levels using a penetrometer. It measures pounds per square inch at different layers in the soil. The idea is to see if any pans have built up over time which affect water movement throughout the profile. Monthly, I take nine readings across the green (see graph below).


As soon as the test was implemented, I could see that there was a slight pan between the 100 and 200mm layer. Over the years, the aeration of the greens was channeled in this range as that was what the machinery capabilities allowed for. Based on the results, from 2010 we


Measuring sward density


The density of the sward appears fairly consistent over the years, with a slight increase in 2011. I observed that, if I took a reading after a granular application of


Tools used during the three year tests


started to aerate above 100mm (shallow aeration) and below the 200mm layer (deep aeration). Now, when I put the penetrometer into the greens, I feel it sliding through the 100-200mm range, instead of feeling resistance.


Sward Density


My last agronomic test measures sward density by recording the number of leaves in a randomly selected 2cm². As with the other in-house tests, it is conducted monthly and the average results for each year are as follows:


- 2010 - 104 plants in a 2cm² - 2011 - 116 plants in a 2cm² - 2012 - 102 plants in a 2cm²


fertiliser, the numbers would shoot up but, after a foliar application, the numbers were very consistent. It proves, once again, that to produce consistent growth, little and often applications of fertiliser are needed instead of giving it all at once.


Maintenance Programme


In the past, I have been criticised for not giving the full picture. So, in the spirit of full disclosure, and before I go on to my observations and conclusions, here is the full greens maintenance programme at Ealing Golf Club:


Ealing GC Greens Maintenance Programme Item


Nitrogen kg/ha Phosphorus kg/ha Potassium kg/ha Sand Tonnage Aeration


Verti-cutting Fungicide


Applications Overseeding Rainfall (mm) Irrigation (mm)


Speed in Feet -


Apr to Sept Speed in Feet -


Oct to Mar Smoothness 1 to


10 - Apr to Sept Smoothness 1 to


10 - Oct to Mar Height of Cut


(Prism in mm) - Apr to Sept


Height of Cut


(Prism in mm) - Oct to Mar


Rounds played Greens cost in £


112 PC FEBRUARY/MARCH 2013 Compaction Test - PSI


(including all wages set at £10.5ph, materials and fuels)


30,962 35,392 33,997 27,780 26,570 25,798


2.6 2.9 2.7 N/A 8.9 N/A 7.6 1.9 2 8.9 8.1 2 22 31


2010 2011 2012 150 149 152 23


261 226 166 186 154 125 13 10 4


7 7 4


0 0


8 2 4


0


483 477 743 216 183 110


Evapo-Transporation 614 639 580 (mm)


10.6 10.8 10.2 8.2 8.3 8.4


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148