This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Implant course


adventure A Southern


Grant Mathieson describes his recent visit to the P-I Brånemark Institute of South Africa


I


was very pleased to be invited to the Advanced Implant Dentistry Course held in March 2013 at the Brånemark Institute in


Johannesburg. This three-day intensive course covered both surgical and prosthodontic procedures in fi ne detail and concentrated on angulated and wide body implants. Leading the team from


the University of Witwa- tersrand were Professor Dale Howes for prosthodontics and Dr Greg Boyes–Varley for maxillo-facial surgery. They demonstrated live surgical and prosthodontic procedures including the use of zygo- matic implants and immediate loading of a full arch maxilla. This course is sponsored by locally-based Southern Implants who have been at the forefront of developments into implant surface technology and angulated implant design. Zygomatic implant placement for extensive reconstructions were covered and gave an insight into the scale of chal- lenges faced in South Africa with gunshot injuries and oncology. The course reinforced


current dental implant practice in the UK with a preference for screw retained restora- tions and passivity of fi t. The


“The course reinforced current dental implant practice in the UK with a preference for screw retained restorations and passivity of fi t” Grant Mathieson


use of angulated implants in the anterior maxilla is an ideal example of combining surgical and prosthodontic requirements for an optimal


outcome. The reduced need for grafting and predictable palatal screw access are signifi - cant advantages with the use of the angulated Co-Axis fi xture.


These angulated implants are also advantageous in the posterior maxilla where there is a reduced need for sinus grafting and the necessity for angled abutment correction. Southern Implants have a vast selection of prostho- dontic components to suit any clinical situation but I was interested to discuss the pref- erence for passive abutments favoured by Prof Howes. This simple laboratory procedure has signifi cant advantages in terms of passivity of fi t and


Scottish Dental magazine 31 Continued »


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84