This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
[RIGGER’S CORNER]


SYNTHETIC WEB SLINGS – UV Degradation


CONTRIBUTED BY MIKE RIGGS, RIGGING INSTITUTE, WWW.RIGGINGINSTITUTE.COM W


hen a load is small, light, polished, fragile or delicate, polyester and nylon web slings are one of the most common synthetic


slings used because web slings are less likely to damage the surface of the load then other styles.


Web slings are quite fl exible and provide a secure grip around the lifted load. T ese slings also have the added benefi t of being lightweight, making them easier to handle than a steel sling. Severe environments that contain chemicals, high operating temperatures, damaging edges, protrusions or roughness will aff ect the performance of polyester or web slings. Synthetic web slings must always be protected from protrusions and edges of loads. Most accidents that occur with synthetic web slings are the result of damage caused by either cutting or ultra-violet (UV) light degradation. ASME B30.9-5.9.4 Removal Criteria states: “A synthetic webbing sling shall


be removed from service if conditions such as the following are present… (h) discoloration and brittle or stiff area on any part of the sling, which may mean chemical or ultraviolet/sunlight damage…”.


Ultraviolet Light (UV) Ultraviolet light mainly comes from the sun, although other sources include fl uorescent lighting, black light, welder arcs, and Xenon light (used in automobile headlights). A human who is exposed to ultraviolet light will develop sunburn if protection is not used. Likewise, synthetic materials used for tension members that are exposed to the elements will eventually show signs of deterioration if not properly protected. All synthetics need protection if the user desires to have its full strength


remain over a long period of time. Ropes and cordage slings that are made from aramid material are generally sheathed in polyester in order to maintain the veracity of the fi nished product when exposed to sunlight on a regular basis. T e polyester acts as a sacrifi cial component while the aramid is the strength bearing member.


UV light degrades synthetic materials by transferring energy into the fi bers often causing damage by breaking down the molecular bonds in the fi ber structure. Darker colors provide better UV resistance than lighter colors and thicker materials resist UV light better than thinner materials.


Testing T e WSTDA (Web Sling & Tie Down Association) conducted UV testing on polyester and nylon web slings in 2006. T e testing showed that polyester webbing held up to UV better than nylon webbing. After a twelve month period UV degradation leveled off at a 30% loss of sling strength. However, the slings made from nylon webbing lost strength of 50% to 60% over a thirty-six month period with no signs of leveling off .


20% 10% 0%


-10% -20% -30% -40% -50%


5 X WLL


CTRL 6 12 16 20


MONTHS OF EXPOSURE AVERAGE OF 4 TESTS


WLL = Working Load Limit = Rated Capacity


UNTREATED TREATED


Polyester web slings lost up to 30% of their strength during the fi rst 12 months, and then leveled off .


WIRE ROPE EXCHANGE JULY-AUGUST 2012 83 24 28 32 36


ALL UV TESTS OF 2” NYLON 66 CLASS 5 AND 7 - 1 AND 2 PLY - TYPE 5 ENDLESS SLINGS


40% 30% 20% 10% 0%


-10% -20% -30% -40% -50%


5 X WLL


CTRL 6 12 16 20


MONTHS OF EXPOSURE AVERAGE OF 4 TESTS


WLL = Working Load Limit = Rated Capacity


UNTREATED TREATED


Nylon web slings lost 50% - 60% of their strength after 36 months, with NO indication of leveling off .


24 28 32 36


DESIGN FACTOR 7 : 1


6 : 1


5 : 1


4 : 1


3 : 1


ALL UV TESTS OF 2” POLYESTER CLASS 5 AND 7 - 1 AND 2 PLY - TYPE 5 ENDLESS SLINGS


DESIGN FACTOR 6 : 1


5 : 1


4 : 1


3 : 1


PERCENT LOSS FROM 5 X WLL


PERCENT LOSS FROM 5 X WLL


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88