This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
XTRAC INDY GEARBOX


Indy gear


Better, cheaper, longer lasting and approved by everyone. That was the brief, this is the result


BY LAWRENCE BUTCHER


the outgoing IR07 chassis, with the intention of reducing costs to teams, increasing safety and provide exciting racing for the fans. Incorporated in the DW12 package is a new, six-speed, sequential transmission that will be produced by UK-based manufacturer, Xtrac. The company was the logical choice as it previously supplied a transmission to the series, in the form of the Xtrac 295, which provided reliable service for the best part of a decade. The new gearbox is the


2


product of a coordinated effort between everybody involved, which made for an unusual development programme, as Richard Billyeald, principal engineer at Xtrac, explains: ‘It was a very interesting project because it was not just us and Dallara. It involved the teams and IndyCar as well. So the teams obviously have their own wish list and some things we could do and others we couldn’t. You ask 12 teams what they want and you will usually get 12 different answers back. IndyCar were obviously setting the spec with Dallara too, so there was a good relationship with them, too. However, the budget


012 sees the debut of the Dallara DW12, the all-new IndyCar racer, designed to replace


for the transmission was considerably tighter, thanks to IndyCar’s cost-saving intentions, so incorporating all of the improvements [we wanted] was challenging.’ The new transmission,


designated the 1011, has minimal carry-over parts from the old unit, though it is not an entirely new design. ‘We had a number things we wanted to change from the original 295 ’box, and some features we wanted to retain,’ highlights Billyeald. ‘It was a well regarded ’box and the guys working on it liked it and liked working on it. We wanted to maintain serviceability, with the gear cluster coming out of the back [so] you can change it mid-race, which has been done! But there were some improvements, such as changing the overall ratio without breaking the ’box off the car, that we also wanted to incorporate.’


CLOSE COMMUNICATION The working relationship with chassis manufacturer, Dallara, was a close one by necessity, with modern communications making occasions such as daily conferences a simple matter. This close working partnership was vital as the transmission forms an integral part of the chassis, to an even greater


54 www.racecar-engineering.com • May 2012


extent than it did on the outgoing chassis. This is thanks to factors such as the location of suspension components. On the previous Dallara IR07 chassis, the suspension rockers were mounted on the bellhousing, whereas on the DW12 they are integral to the gearbox casing. The result is a gearbox that has grown in length and a bellhousing that has shrunk. Considerable collaboration was also required in relation to the design of the rear crash structure and the attendant tests. ‘The side push off and rear crash tests were very important. The rear crash structure was


initially tested on its own and then attached to the gearbox and re-tested as a whole,’ explains Billyeald. Xtrac’s F1 knowledge and experience gained with series such as A1GP meant that accommodating the impact requirements was a relatively straightforward task. The close sharing of CAD and


simulation data with Dallara, combined with the company’s own extensive FEA abilities, also


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100