This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
“The EQIP program is very popular and we’ve also added some special offerings like programs to protect the sage grouse in the West, address air quality in the Central Valley and conserve water in Kansas and Nebraska,” says Natural Resources Conservation Service Chief Dave White.

Will Conservation Once Again Be On The Cutting Board? Concerns About The Federal Deficit Drive Renewed Interest In Spending Cuts



ith a federal budget deficit that the Obama Adminis- tration now estimates at a

whopping $1.47 trillion for 2010, it’s highly likely that, after the mid- term elections this fall, budget

cutters will be looking to trim in every nook and cranny. Little surprise, then, that a wide variety

of agricultural groups are making a pre-emptive strike to showcase their importance of their pro- grams and hopefully, avoid the budget knife. Federal farm price support programs used to be

the biggest targets when it came to focusing on places to cut. But with the growth in spending on crop insurance and conservation in recent years (see pie chart), these program areas have become the newest targets. And conservation programs could be at the top of the list. Why? Lawmakers have been gradually increas-

ing funding for conservation, while making plans to cut crop insurance. In fact, crop insurance spending already took a hit last month when the Obama Administration announced plans to cut $6 billion out of that program, with $4 billion going to reduce the federal deficit. Now lawmakers are looking at whether or not

there is any “fat” in conservation spending or other areas that can be trimmed. The National Association of Conservation Dis-

tricts (NACD) says raiding conservation programs to fund other programs doesn’t make any sense – especially when you consider the strong demand for conservation out in the countryside. Demand outstrips supply Case in point: The Environmental Quality Incen-

tives Program (EQIP) provided over $731 million in “financial assistance” (FA) funds for producer contracts in fiscal 2009. But applications worth an estimated $1.36 billion were unfunded.

In California alone, almost 7,000 applications totaling over $126 million were still waiting for funds at the end of the fiscal year, according to Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) data (See table). The unmet needs continued with unfunded applications in Oklahoma (over 6,300), Mississippi (4,670), Missouri (4,519), Arkansas (2120) and South Dakota (1,584). These application numbers do not include Technical Assistance (TA) funds used for salary and other costs associated with program management.

For most farmers, EQIP provides payments up to

75 percent of the incurred costs and income fore- gone of certain conservation practices and activi- ties. Underserved producers (Limited resource farmers/ranchers, beginning farmers/ranchers, socially disadvantaged producers) may be eligible for payments up to 90 percent.


Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado

Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho

Illinois Indiana Iowa


Kentucky Louisiana Maine


workhorse? showhorse? ...yes

Visit Your Local New Holland Dealer Today!


When you care for horses, there’s always plenty of work to be done. TN-A Series tractors are real workhorses that look great too. Ask a New Holland dealer about the long list of high- efficiency features that help TN-A Series tractors preserve your most valuable possession—time!

• CLEAN, UNCLUTTERED OPERATOR AREA features controls that are easy and natural to use.

• SLOPED HOOD AND NEW HEADLIGHT DESIGN provides visibility that’s best on the market at any hour of day.

• EASIEST SHUTTLING IN THE BUSINESS makes working with a loader a pleasure. Every model features a convenient, left-hand, in-line shuttle lever.

• SHARPEST TURNS – The SuperSteer™ FWD axle on TNS-A models delivers the tightest turns in the business.



The 2008 Farm Bill authorized gradually increasing amounts for EQIP funding, starting at $1.2 billion in 2008 and reaching $1.75 billion in 2012. But appropriators have not been fully funding the program, resulting in “unused” authorized funds that are often being “chimped” and allocated elsewhere. (The official term for this official method of taking funds away from mandatory programs is Change In Mandatory Programs or CHIMP. Capitol Hill insiders refer to these raids on mandatory funding as “chimping” or being “chimped.”)

M & S Implement Company Harrisburg, Ill. • 618-253-7600

KENTUCKY Ward Implement Co.

Beech Grove, Ky. • 800-264-0206 MISSOURI DEALER NAME & LOGO ©2005 CNH America LLC

Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Blanche Lincoln has considered using EQIP to pay for increased funding for the child nutrition bill, drawing howls from members of the conservation and environmental community. However, as her staff members point out, the proposed cuts of $2.8 billion over 10 years are from an authorized level, not actually from dollars that were going to producers.

Vermont Virginia

Davis Farm Supplies, Inc. Perryville, Mo. • 573-547-4556


NACD President Steve Robinson, a corn, soybean and wheat producer farming 900 acres in Marysville, OH. Says that NACD would like the 2012 Farm Bill to do what the 2008 Farm Bill did – increase conservation funding. His group was encouraged by the administration's budget proposal to increase USDA's NRCS Conservation Operations Account from FY 2010's $887.6 million to $923.7 million for FY 2011. The $923.7 compares with a Senate Appropriations

Tri County Farmers Equipment Newbern, Tenn. • 901-627-2541

Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming TOTAL

$74,665,929 $2,392,325 $5,170,097 $23,024,194 $16,086,402 $10,919,423 $82,384,306 $46,407,472 $8,994,671 $15,303,824 $37,661,017 $26,374,691 $13,494,215 $12,845,294


1,048 1,682 1,405 2,372 1,094

110,077 “The EQIP program is very popular and we’ve

also added some special offerings like programs to protect the sage grouse in the West, address air quality in the Central Valley and conserve water in Kansas and Nebraska,” says Natural

CONTINUED ON PAGE 10 August 6, 2010 / MidAmerica Farmer Grower • 3

Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada

New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York

North Carolina North Dakota Ohio

Oklahoma Oregon

Pacific Basin Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah

Estimated Unfunded Application Dollars 2009

$17,317,725 $1,517,662 $31,693,417 $12,246,628 $126,184,541 $24,885,704 $2,698,692 $10,883,347 $44,294,339 $32,853,691 $3,432,121 $31,625,551 $6,211,243 $7,897,565 $34,490,478 $30,523,662 $29,085,396 $26,211,226 $14,092,023 $3,995,410 $11,560,866 $27,788,265 $11,096,310 $9,312,299 $43,047,610 $40,376,782 $63,009,430 $8,189,015 $2,207,065 $9,826,560 $37,295,705 $39,158,038 $32,099,187 $38,441,004 $22,885,744

$77,205,284 $19,890,647 $83,168

Number of Unfunded Applications 3,673

68 606

2,120 6,832 2,013 150 706

1,901 4,306 255

1,383 1,767 1,405 4,163 3,002 3,403 2,667 813 663 540 938

1,873 4,670 4,519 2,645 5,107 292 430 433

1,760 1,653 1,863 2,706 2,764 6,359 1,302 87

3,059 576 198

1,488 1,584 2,721 8,695 1,724 594

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25
Produced with Yudu -