Quantum
HEALTH
On The Application of Human Body Field Theory:
Jason Siczkowycz (NES practitioner)
Correlates of Informational and Energetic Distortions With Functional Aspects of Human Physiology
By Jason Siczkowycz (NES practitioner)
Y
ou receive regular medical screening and treatment, but you still have symptoms. Why? Maybe you feel good physically, but you don’t
mentally and emotionally. Why? First, I would argue that, on the physical level, you are probably dealing with a less than ideal function of some area of your physiology, but it isn’t nearly bad enough to be refl ected as a disease process based on regular medical screening. In other words, your liver enzymes might not be elevated, for example, but your liver might be sub-clinically weak. This one example can lead, in my opinion, to dozens of symptoms, and eventually diseases. Secondly, I would argue that, prior to the symptoms of sub-clinical or functional issues with the liver (in this example), there was a distortion in the Human Body-Field, the “informational and energetic” fi eld that governs biology. Distortions in this fi eld may occur months or years prior to symptoms. I’m not arguing that you shouldn’t receive regular medical screening; medical diagnostics are immensely useful and important and absolutely required to provide evidence of pathology (disease). However, there is a place for “functional diagnostics” as a complement to your regular medical screening, and I believe among the most sensitive are computerized Body-Field analyzing technologies.
The idea of functional/sub-clinical disturbances in
48 Quantum Health
human physiology is immensely interesting to me, because for the last thirteen years, I’ve noticed strong correlations with specifi c symptoms and specifi c functional imbalances. I’ve also noticed anecdotal resolution of symptoms after correcting functional imbalances. Functional disturbances can obviously be very complicated, multi-layered, and also have a multitude of causal factors. That being said, what I believe some of the most useful information I’ve learned over these years is what sub-clinical/functional issues to look for when symptom-sets are presented. Importantly, my anecdotal experience shouldn’t be used as a suggestion of “cookie-cutter”, or “one size fi ts all” protocols to use just because a person has a specifi c symptom. Also very important to point out is that sometimes the distortions and their physiological correlates don’t make sense from the perspective of what we understand about normal human anatomy and physiology. This happens a lot too, and speaks to the idea that we are just beginning to understand this whole other control system that appears to govern biology. And it certainly is a beautiful thing when you start with correcting “macro” or large fi eld distortions in the body-fi eld without addressing any specifi c bioenergetic correlates and you achieve dramatic anecdotal symptomatic improvements.
One of the most common symptom sets seen in any health practitioners offi ce and one which
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50