This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
AMINO ACIDS continued


Table 3 – RTs and SIR windows/values for the 17 analytes RT (min) 5.18 5.80 6.57 6.90 7.19 8.87


Amino acid Phe Tyr


Leu Met Ile


10.40 10.70 11.22 11.68 11.97 12.90 13.40 16.40 21.40 22.20 23.80


Val Glu Pro Thr Asp Ala Ser Gly Cys His Lys Arg


SIR–RT windows 0.00–6.40 4.60–6.50 6.00–8.00 6.00–8.00 6.00–8.00 8.00–10.00 9.30–11.50 9.30–11.50 10.40–12.20 10.60–12.90 11.40–12.90 12.30–14.20 12.30–14.20 15.30–17.50 20.50–22.50 20.50–22.50 22.50–25.0


SIR (m/z) 166.0 182.0 132.0 150.0 132.0 118.2 148.0 116.0 120.1 134.0 90.0


106.1 76.0


241.0 156.0 147.0 175.1


acid was 2.50 μmol/mL in 0.1N HCl, except for cysteine, which was present at 1.25 μmol/ mL. The standard was diluted to 1.0 μmol/ mL for the working standard 1 (WS1) and to 0.1 μmol/mL for the working standard 2 (WS2). WS1 was used for the calibration of alanine and cysteine, because these two amino acids have lower sensitivity. The lower level standards were prepared from each of the two working standards via serial dilution with the diluent. Prior to injection, all calibration standards and samples were fi ltered through 0.45-μm fi lters to remove any small particles.


Results and discussion Figure 1 shows the overlay of the selected ion


recordings (SIRs) for all 17 amino acids, using the optimized conditions described above. The analysis time was under 25 minutes. Table 3 shows the retention times (RTs) and SIR win- dows/values used for each amino acid.


An overlay of 10 replicates of 0.1 µmol/mL histidine standard is shown in Figure 2. A fi ve- level calibration suite was used, covering a concentration range of 0.006 to 0.10 μmol/mL, except for alanine and cysteine, which covered a concentration range of 0.06 to 1.00 μmol/mL.


Figure 3 shows the representative calibration data for aspartic acid, glycine, histidine and methionone. All amino acids followed a qua- dratic (2nd-order) fi t.


Figure 2 – Overlay of 10 replicates of 0.1 µmol/mL histidine standard. AMERICAN LABORATORY 24 APRIL 2016


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52