today would be only weeks away from a bomb.
In that scenario, the U.S. would
MILITARY AND
VETERAN
NETWORKING FORUM
Sept. 24, 2015 6:30 p.m.-10 p.m. Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, Washington, D.C.
Invite-only event; email
career@moaa.org to request your invitation.
www.moaa.org/2015 networkingforum
have been faced with the dilemma of pursuing military action or al- lowing Iran to achieve a virtual nuclear capability. And if today we walk away or Congress votes down the deal, the possibility that Iran responds by accelerating its nuclear program and forces that same choice is very real. It is certainly true Iran would suffer much more in a direct mili- tary conflict than the U.S. But a military strike on Iran’s nuclear program would set it back only a
few years. In the aftermath, Iran would emerge far more determined to pursue a nuclear weapon. And tremendous risks and un- certainties are associated with war, which is why it is an option that should only be pursued as a last resort. As we’ve learned from our 25 years of engagement in Iraq, war is unpredictable and the costs are high. When an im- perfect but credible diplomatic alternative that meets our national interests is available, we should take it.
MO
Pro
TAKE ACTION
Congress has until Sept. 17 to reject or endorse the agreement on how to deal with Iran’s nuclear program. Contact your congressional legislators to voice your opinion on the deal. Visit
www.moaa.org/ contactcongress to find your elected officials.
size of Alaska. And even if inspectors do stumble across a suspected site, the JCPOA triggers a dispute resolu- tion process that lasts upwards of 24 days, affording Iran an opportunity to scrub its sites clean of illicit materials. Meanwhile, Iran’s competitors, aware of these monitoring challenges, will be incentivized to explore their own nuclear capabilities. As the Washington Institute’s
Robert Satloff has noted, if Iran is discovered to be in violation of the agreement, the JCPOA envisions one, and only one, enforcement mechanism: “snapback” of U.N. Security Council sanctions. Therefore, even significant Iranian viola-
Con 108 MILITARY OFFICER SEPTEMBER 2015
tions committed over time likely are to go unpunished, especially as entrenched interests, from German businesses to the Russian defense in- dustry, rally against snapback. In the end, no matter how much
we congratulate our negotiators, agreements like the Agreed Frame- work and the JCPOA always will be available to us, provided we make enough concessions. A better course would be to take the advice of another Sherman, who observed after the Civil War that “fear is the beginning of wisdom.” By drawing on U.S. coercive powers, we should compel Iran into a fundamental choice: either your nuclear infra- structure or your economy, but you cannot have both.
MO
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124