This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
washingtonscene


every chief of staff and military legislative assistant in both the House and Senate. He sent copies of the Military Times article along with MOAA’s publication Retirement About Face? explaining the potential down- sides of converting military retirement to a 401(k) system. MOAA believes these proposals by the MCRMC require further study. Before changing the retirement system, Congress must fully consider the second- and third- order effects on the all-volunteer force.


Claims Backlog T


Improves An integrated strategy results in significant progress.


he VA claims backlog fell to 194,000, a 68-percent reduc- tion from two years ago. In 2013,


the VA amassed over 611,000 disability claims. Quality of claims decisions has increased from 83 percent in 2011 to 91 percent today. The VA defines the backlog as initial claims that have waited at least 125 days for a decision. In 2014, the VA processed over 1.3 mil- lion claims, an increase of 150,000 over 2013. Even as demand continues to rise — measured in the number and complexity of claims filed — progress toward eliminating the backlog by the end of the year appears to be within reach. The progress is a result of a compre-


hensive, integrated strategy for improving the claims-management system. The strat- egy focuses on making correct decisions up front. Leading the transformation is the conversion of an antiquated paper-in- tensive management system to a paperless environment called the Veterans Ben- efits Management System (VBMS). Most


40 MILITARY OFFICER JULY 2015


claims now have been scanned into VBMS, with only 24,000 paper claims remaining in the system. Better training of disability raters and the use of online guidelines also have resulted in greater consistency in decisions. However, sustaining the momentum might be difficult. The VA has relied on mandatory overtime for claims workers to reduce the backlog. MOAA calls on the VA to develop a long-term manpower and administrative requirement plan. Deliv- ering this plan to Congress will ensure the claims system can keep pace with the demand over the next decade as veterans from the nation’s longest sustained con- flicts enter the VA system. A related challenge is the backlog of ap- pealed claims. When an initial claim is de- nied, veterans have the right to appeal to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. These claims take an average of 1,000 days — almost three years — to adjudicate. MOAA and several service groups have endorsed the concept of a “fully developed appeal,” similar to the fully developed claim process that has measurably accelerated the initial claims process. In a fully developed appeal, a veteran could waive certain pro- cedural steps in order to fast-track a final decision by the board. At any time in the process, the veteran could opt back into the traditional appeals process. Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas) and


House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chair Rep. Jeff Miller (R-Fla.) introduced legisla- tion to direct the VA to carry out a five-year program to provide an alternative process to determine appeals for disability claims more quickly. It’s too soon to tell whether the VA will eliminate the initial claims backlog this year. As progress on this elusive goal con- tinues, MOAA is pleased to see Miller and O’Rourke are leading creative efforts to re- duce the appealed claims backlog.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88