yourviews
MILITARY OFFICER
MAY 2015 $4.75 THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF MOAA | NEVER STOP SERVINGTM
WWW.MOAA.ORG
CHANGE WITH CARE, NOT STATUS QUO In testimony, MOAA warns against rash military health care reform 31
STRIKE RISK Lightning and its effects pose a danger to members of the military 58
Expertise The
Unique
Special operations forces address a spectrum of threats around the globe 52
PLUS: EXPLORE MOAA’S 2015 TRANSITION GUIDE
MCRMC should visit a few local VA hospitals to see what skin in the game really means.
“
—Cmdr. P.D. Fitzpatrick, USN (Ret)
”
Reform Refrain I read with interest [“The Same Old Re- form Song,” Washington Scene, May 2015]. It is sad and really an unkind joke that our leaders in the Pentagon think more like politicians than like military offi cers. No other federal agency experiences the up and downs of personnel like the military. Do we ever see [the Department of Health and Human Services, the Envi- ronmental Protection Agency, or the IRS] or any other agency take drastic cuts like the military? No. We send our troops out to do battle, dump them when they get home, and mess with their retirement. As a Life member of MOAA and the
[Veterans of Foreign Wars], I appreciate the eff orts these organizations do to pro- tect the people who serve and who have served. It would be nice if the four-stars in the Pentagon took up the same concern. Those “leaders” should ask Congress to take a cut in their benefi ts equivalent to what is suggested for us before they mess with military retirement. However, I know the answer: They won’t. — Col. Richard G. Donoghue, USAR (Ret) Bradenton (Fla.) Chapter, Life Member via email
In … “The Same Old Reform Song,” it would be interesting to know the ratio of civilians to former [servicemembers] that make up the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission (MCRMC).
The commission’s idea on servicemem- bers’ new retirement plan to have “skin in the game” is a noteworthy phrase. The MCRMC should visit a few local VA hos- pitals to see what skin in the game really means. Perhaps they would reconsider their phrase or retirement plan. — Cmdr. P.D. Fitzpatrick, USN (Ret) Life Member via email
16 MILITARY OFFICER JULY 2015
In the Washington Scene section of Military Offi cer, a recurring theme is protecting our future medical coverage under TRICARE. This month, [MOAA President Vice
Adm. Norbert R. Ryan Jr., USN (Ret)] is quoted as testifying to Congress that the status quo is “simply unacceptable.” I have been enrolled in the USFHP
(Uniformed Services Family Health Plan), the TRICARE Prime alternative off ered in some markets, for 10-plus years. If I can believe the marketing ma- terial distributed by USFHP and Pacifi c Medical Centers ([PacMed], the USFHP contractor for the Seattle area) over the years, USFHP is a very effi cient use of our TRICARE dollars. Further, we (my late wife, my current
wife, and I) have found the medical care provided by PacMed to be top-notch. Also, the absence of the requirement for TRICARE approval of referrals from our primary care provider is refreshing after having dealt with other civilian and mili- tary insurance programs in the past. My question is, why do MOAA and other similar organizations not promote USFHP and/or a similar, expanded pro- gram as a viable alternative to the status quo for the future? It seems to me that an HMO-type program with predictable costs — exactly what USFHP is — may well be the answer to the continuing funding battle. Three years ago, Congress severely
restricted future access to USFHP by Medicare-eligible dependents of retirees, which will serve to reduce the client base for USFHP and likely threaten its viability. That kind of unpredictability is exactly what we do not need when trying to make our retirement plans! I just don’t under- stand why such a move was made, other than the fact that there are relatively few of us to object.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88