washingtonscene
LEGISLATIVE NEWS THAT AFFECTS YOU Markup Begins
The defense bill markup from the House Armed Services personnel subcommittee rejects DoD proposals to cut military pay and benefits but includes controversial retirement reform proposals.
O
n April 23, the House Armed Services personnel subcom- mittee released its markup of
H.R. 1735, the FY 2016 National Defense Authorization Bill. None of DoD’s propos- als to cut pay and benefits were included. “The mark provides our warfight- ers [and] retirees and their families the care and support they need, deserve, and earned,” said panel chair Rep. Joe Heck (R-Nev.).
The subcommittee rejected DoD’s
request to decrease the commissary sub- sidy, which would have led to reduced hours and operating days. Before mak- ing changes to the commissary system, subcommittee members are waiting for a congressionally mandated study on the effects of price markups in commissaries, which is due in September. The subcommittee also advanced mea-
sures requiring DoD to improve sexual assault response and prevention efforts for male servicemembers. Additionally, the bill included continued funding for local schools with significant numbers of military dependents.
Although the personnel subcommittee
rejected DoD’s budget-driven proposals, it did include controversial aspects of the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission’s proposals to overhaul military retirement. As this issue went to press, the House Armed Services Committee was begin- ning its markup of the defense bill and
the Senate was expected to begin work on the bill a few weeks later.
MOAA Testifies I
on Proposals Drastic changes to military benefits require careful analysis.
n late March, MOAA and other military advocacy groups testified about the Military Compensation and
Retirement Modernization Commission’s (MCRMC’s) proposals, and panelists split over proposals that would dramatically alter retirement benefits. Speaking before the House Armed Services Committee, MOAA Director of Government Relations Col. Mike Hayden, USAF (Ret), questioned whether MCRMC proposals to shift servicemembers into a 401(k) retirement system will encourage more people to leave or stay. “We are very concerned that the new system lacks the drawing power to sustain servicemembers to 20 years of service,” Hayden said. Under the MCRMC’s retirement propos- al, servicemembers will receive a 20-per- cent reduction in military retired pay, in addition to matching government contribu- tions in the federal Thrift Savings Plan. The success of the commission’s propos- al is completely dependent on the financial literacy of the force. Unfortunately, by the commission’s admission, only 12 percent
JUNE 2015 MILITARY OFFICER 31
Take Action Keep up-to-date on legislation affecting the military community, read about MOAA’s legislative initiatives, and find and contact your elected of- ficials at
www.moaa.org/ takeaction.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96