REFLECTIONS


PROTEST LIKE IT’S 1993.


PHOTO: RAY SMITH / TIMES COLONIST


KICKIN’ IT OLD SCHOOL After a long hiatus, paddler advocates are back with a vengeance


SEA KAYAKING HAS ALWAYS BEEN STRONG on tradition. Paddlers revive old Inuit techniques, build boats from designs in museums, and retrace long-ago expeditions. We have another important tradition that we neglected until recently: being a force for conservation. In 1954, a paddler and retired chemistry professor named Harold Bradley teamed up with a group of river runners to save the Yampa River from dams in what is now Dinosaur National Monument. The campaign transformed a modest outdoor club into a household name in conservation: they're called the Sierra Club. A decade later, river guide Martin Litton led a campaign to keep dams out of the Grand Canyon. More recently, in 1993, sea kayakers joined forces with environmentalists and First Nations to save Vancouver Island’s Clayoquot Sound from wholesale logging. The protests marked the largest act of civil disobedience in the nation’s history, and preserved what is now one of the world’s best-known paddling meccas. Then conservation abruptly disappeared from the paddling community’s agenda. Kayakers turned inward, focusing narrowly on the sport. In 2006, I was even told by a local paddling club that I couldn't make an announcement about a campaign to protect natural areas, because it might be “divisive.”


Why the retreat? Ironically, one reason was 34 | ADVENTURE KAYAK


success. Led by the likes of Litton, Bradley, David Brower and Edward Abbey, with roots firmly in outdoor exploration, the first wave of conservation won major victories in the ‘60s and ‘70s. Those victories created environmental laws that relied on science and legal action for enforcement. The need was suddenly for ecologists and lawyers who could appeal timber sales, file Clean Water Act suits, and protest obscure agency procedures.


About the same time, the sport of kayaking was growing and manufacturers and clubs found themselves maneuvering for customers and members. In this increasingly competitive environment, many feared alienating one side of the conservation debate.


After a two-decade hiatus, however, kayakers are re-embracing the art of advocacy. Conservation groups reached the limit of what they could achieve through law and science alone, and returned to mobilizing passionate people. In Portland, paddlers made headlines in 2012 by arranging their crafts into a giant “350” on the river (the amount of carbon dioxide, in parts per million, the atmosphere can tolerate without cataclysm). From student Anna Gleizer’s 2012 circumnavigation of Siberia’s Lake Baikal to study water quality and climate effects, to the Sitka Conservation Society’s trips to survey wilderness areas and watchdog timber sales, paddling and


advocacy have merged once more. We’ve also made the leap from raising awareness and collecting data to the hard-nosed work of changing policy. Letters and emails from paddlers helped shift the Forest Service from logging toward wilderness protection in Alaska and pushed a river-mining moratorium in Oregon. Modern paddler-activists have another powerful tool at our disposal: the technological democracy of the Internet. One example is Out of Sight, Out of Mind, a marine debris campaign created on the cheap by kayak instructors using Facebook and Kickstarter.


In the next few years, I predict that kayakers’ resurgent conservation ethic will find the sweet spot between freewheeling awareness-raising and more coordinated strategies needed to create marine reserves, regulate pollution and pressure policymakers.


Back in British Columbia, paddlers of all stripes are once again on the frontlines of a pivotal battle. The stakes are every bit as high as in ‘93: the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline to Kitimat would transform the wild Central Coast into a tanker freeway vulnerable to a Valdez-size oil spill. The lost tradition has returned just in time. Longtime contributor Neil Schulman celebrates kayaking’s diverse heritage in Reflections.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84