Process Equipment Update
efficiency and increased energy consumption (Fig. 1). It can diagnose both failed-open steam traps that leak live steam and those that have failed-closed or are blocked that result in waterlogging leading to plant damage, product spoilage and health and safety concerns. Using non-intrusive installation technology
combined with a 2.4GHz wireless network, the company says it is an ideal solution for steam trap monitoring. It is suitable for use with all types of steam trap and
can be connected to pipework up to 100mm (4-in), via an adjustable clamp.
Sound signature The head unit assembly mounted on the pipe upstream of the trap to be monitored ‘listens’ to the sound signature of the trap in operation. This sound signature is categorised and transmitted via the wireless network to a central PC. The PC determines the trap condition and calculates any steam loss. Each STAPS head unit assembly is powered by
a long life lithium battery which can last up to ten years. It can communicate directly to a receiver that is connected to the PC software via a LAN connection or via another intelligent head or repeater. The PC software can be installed onto a PC on the sites internal network, or onto a standalone local PC. The STAPS head, repeater and receiver create a
network and can communicate with each other, passing on the steam trap data to the supervisory PC. Developed at the company’s global R&D centre in Cheltenham, UK, and tested at its own and customer facilities around the world, STAPS is now on the market.
Preventative maintenance Meanwhile Emerson reports success from a wireless steam trap monitoring project it has just completed
for a major food processor in the USA. In an effort to prevent steam trap failures the company had already implemented a preventative maintenance (PM) schedule. However, with close to 100 traps in the plant, PM
could only be performed once per year – taking up to 100 hours in total. For steam trap monitoring, the company decided
to install nine 708 Rosemount wireless acoustic transmitters which provide acoustic event detection, including leaks in steam traps and pressure relief valves. These were placed on steam lines throughout the plant and integrated into the existing Smart Wireless Gateway, which communicates to a plant host system, data historians or energy management software.
Unparalleled visibility The 708 transmitter, with a combination of temperature measurement and acoustic ‘listening’, gives unparalleled visibility into steam trap states. “Manual monitoring of temperature did not give us
enough information to conclusively target a steam trap for replacement when we saw water-hammering,” noted a project engineer from the food processing company. “But when we installed the wireless acoustic transmitter, we could tell immediately which steam trap was stuck.” It was quickly fixed, and a trend of the new trap
showed normal acoustics and temperature. Now the plant has real time alerts for each of the nine steam traps with wireless acoustic transmitters. Some are in wash down areas, and one is in a high humidity environment. All are communicating reliably. Overall the food processor has managed to reduce
energy use by minimising steam blow-through and/ or blocked flow; improved productivity by eliminating preventative maitenance activities on steam traps; and reduced mechanical/asset failures by minimising water- hammering. n
Steam trap assessments are crucial S
o concerned was the US Department of Energy (DOE) about energy wastage that it launched a Save Energy Now campaign to highlight the issues involved. As part of this campaign, the DOE performed a steam assessment at Dow Chemical’s plant in Hahnville, Louisiana, USA. The main objective was to identify opportunities for natural gas savings in the plant’s steam system.
The key findings of the assessment included: quantifying potential energy savings, especially with the assistance of an outside expert, can provide the impetus for management to take
8
www.engineerlive.com
action. Although Dow Chemical had an active energy management programme, the Save Energy Now assessment was able to uncover substantial additional opportunities for energy savings by focusing on a specific system; repairing leaks and failed steam traps. Making these activities permanent can yield substantial energy savings; and, once positive results are achieved, projects implemented as part of an active energy management programme are more likely to be sustained.
The personnel at the site improved their steam trap programme and enhanced their
ongoing leak repair campaign. Although Dow was aware that the efficiency of these systems could be improved, the assessment quantified the potential energy savings in a manner that made it more compelling to implement the improvements. The combined annual energy and cost savings resulting from these two efficiency measures amounted to 272,000 MMBtu and US$1.9 million, respectively.
With project costs of approximately US$225,000, the simple payback was around six weeks. n
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52