This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Deburring & Finishing


Since its inception, turbo-abrasive machining, a method that utilizes fluidized abrasive materials, has facilitated signifi- cant reductions in the amount of manual intervention required to deburr large components. Additionally, the process has also proved to be useful in edge and surface finishing a wide vari-


ety of other nonrotational components by incorporating these components into fixturing systems.


The advantages of this method go beyond the simple removal or attenuation of burrs. The method is also capable of producing surface conditions at these critical edge areas


Understanding Functional Surfaces


utilizing orbital pressure methods with both grinding and polishing free abrasive materials in sequence. The surface profile has been reduced from the original 75–90 Ra


(µin.) to a 5–9 Ra (µin.) range. Additionally,


there has been a plateauing of the surface and the resultant smoother surface manifests a negative skew (Rsk


) instead of a positive skew. This Photo courtesy Jack Clark, Surface Analytics T


his before photograph above was taken with a scanning electron microscope at 500× magnification. It shows the surface of a raw unfinished “as cast” turbine blade. The rough initial surface finish as measured by profilometer was in the 75–90 Ra


(µin.) range. As is typical of


most cast, ground, turned, milled, EDM and forged surfaces this surface shows a positive Rsk


[Rsk –skewness–the measure of surface symmetry about


the mean line of a profilometer graph. Unfinished parts usually display a heavy concentration of surface peaks above this mean line, generally considered to be an undesirable characteristic from a functional viewpoint.]


Photo courtesy Jack Clark, Surface Analytics


This SEM photomicrograph (500× magnification) above was taken after processing the same turbine blade in a multistep procedure


Surface Characterization with Optical Interferometry. Surface topographical mapping is coming into increasing use to bet- ter quantify surfaces as they relate to part service life, function and performance. The surface shown in the top row is one that has been processed to blend in parallel rows of surface peaks left behind from fine grinding operations (as shown in the bottom row of diagrams). The resultant surface is one that is more isotropic or random in nature. This type of surface can be an important surface attribute to parts that are subjected to repeated stress or strain and parts that undergo high force loading of opposing surfaces. Also contributing to the improved functional surface is the negative skew of the surface profile and beneficial compressive stress equilibrium imparted to the parts by high-energy finishing methods.


type of surface is considered to be very “functional” in both the fluid and aerodynamic sense. The smooth, less turbulent flow created by this type of surface is preferred in many aerodynamic applications. Another important consideration the photomicrographs indicate is that surface and subsurface fractures seem to have been removed. Observations with backscatter emission with a scanning electron microscope gave no indication of residual fractures.


64 ManufacturingEngineeringMedia.com | October 2013


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116