Materials
How to optimise your engineering partnership
In a subdued global economic environment, manufacturers and brand owners are faced with a common challenge – how to do more with less. Johan Frithiof reports.
E
ngineers, business leaders and managers remain preoccupied with helping their business establish a competitive advantage with diminishing resources. While manufacturers struggle to cope with
weakness in production capacity, de-skilled workforces, lack of historic R&D investment and new competitors. So, how do these enterprises overcome such
obstacles, break into new markets or reinvigorate existing product portfolios? The answer is simple but, as always, the devil is in the detail. The aim is to get innovations to market with greater
speed, quality and consistency than the competition. Forward-thinking businesses are investing in the future, forging strategic partnerships with engineering specialists.
A systematic process for product development will ensure efficiency and reduce potential errors, sometimes resulting in friction and waste. Take engineered materials - before the R&D project even begins, a valuable partner will calculate price-versus-value expectations and what the client’s product has to compete with in the market. They’ll look at aligning the project and its outcomes
to fit with client’s strategy and ensure it’s technically feasible before commencing. The partner should have a proven process in place to ensure the best, tailor-made solution is provided. Client and partner must discuss agreed deliverables
and ensure they align with the client’s requirements. Evaluations should include: design requirements; product dimensional data; compliancy of performance requirements and standards; testing regimes; relevant processes and treatments; price, volume, timing, etc. Then the viability of product concepts should
be established to filter out those that don’t meet the objectives. Criteria for achieving the optimum result should be discussed before a quote is formulated. The partner should then finalise the product
specification and prepare it for manufacturing. Samples should be produced for client testing, approval and feedback. Approval of initial samples should result in financial commitment to cover the trial stages, until agreement is reached to move to industrialisation stages. The product should undergo a pilot plant process to
reduce risk, before committing to full-scale production and time tables and volumes/ramp up should be established and agreed. On cempletion, the final sign off with appropriate documentation can be accomplished. A process which allows for flexibility in application,
yet aids steady progress by setting out broad parameters and necessary outputs, will provide transparency throughout and the best result for both client and partner. ●
For more information ✔ at
www.engineerlive.com/ede Johan Frithiof, Commercial Director within the
Fig. 1. Trelleborg manufactures bespoke solutions with expertise to add a layer of innovation to every project.
Engineered Fabrics business of Trelleborg, Trelleborg, Sweden.
www.trelleborg.com
www.engineerlive.com 27
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60