Viewpoint | Collateral management | Stefan Lepp The global challenge
The new regulatory focus on risk management has put the spotlight firmly on collateral supply and mobilisation. Stefan Lepp* discusses anew approach in the post-crisis world.
There has been much debate on the size of the potential shortfall in collateral in the market. What is your view on this? As we know, more trades must be collateralised under new regulations. Estimates of the necessary collateral supply in the future range from many trillions to none, and this already tells you a great deal about the uncertainty and confusion in the market. But the question is not if there is enough collateral – and I believe to a certain degree that there is – but whether institutions can identify, access and mobilise it quickly. Many institutions do have a single view of their fragmented collateral and such institutions might also have a picture of worldwide exposures to be covered on a daily basis (more or less in real-time). But what they are often missing is a facility enabling global collateral consolidation as a basis for optimised collateral allocation across all available collateral positions towards multiple exposure locations. Suppliers can achieve this through creating strategic partnerships with institutions holding collateral (central securities depositories, agent banks, global custodians, etc.) while building links to globally active exposure locations (such as CCPs). This model enables previously inaccessible collateral to be mobilised and so softens the impact of the collateral crunch significantly.
How sophisticated does collateral management need to be? That depends on the institution but most need collateral management on a real-time and cross- market basis. Without this, institutions cannot deliver the best – i.e. the cheapest, eligible – collateral to each exposure point. For example, they might have to use triple-A rated paper to cover an exposure
Best Execution | Summer 2013
only requiring single A+ because the single A+ is in another location and cannot be mobilised on time. Systematically over-collateralising in this way bears very high opportunity costs; a Clearstream- Accenture study conservatively reported that this cost globally is north of EUR 4 billion.
How is the industry tackling this challenge? A dedicated collateral management system used to be seen as optional and not a key product. Since the financial crisis, however, collateral has become a worldwide issue and any market solution must meet this global scale. My company, for example, is currently in strategic talks with many institutions, such as CSDs, wanting to become local collateral service providers. CSDs have a central role in national economies and are often well-positioned to deliver secure services to their local markets. These days, however, they run a commercial risk if they cannot meet their client’s collateral management needs. A Finadium study in May 2012 found that only
13% of CSDs surveyed could deliver collateral optimisation, but trying to develop the necessary technology in-house can be a lengthy and costly business. A sustainable solution is for infrastructures to insource a sophisticated system quickly and cost-effectively. This approach has been adopted by the Liquidity Alliance, an association of five CSDs (currently) from around the world which share the same approach to collateral management and believe that strategic partnerships are the smart way to beat the global collateral challenge. n *Stefan Lepp is a member of the Executive
Board of Clearstream and head of its Global Securities Financing division.
59
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92