This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
F


OR caregivers, providing patients with clinical summaries can be quite


challenging, especially when meaningful use dollars are in play. While the meaningful use criteria for clinical summaries says that they must be given to patients for over 50% of all office visits within 3 business days in person or via email, generating a meaningful clinical summary can be a thorny process for a few reasons, according to Robert Lamberts, M.D., a pediatrics and internal medicine physician based in Augusta, GA.


Understanding the Obstacles Lamberts, who shared challenges


in a Physicians Practice article, said that clinical summaries need to be put into a “reasonable format” when given to patients. By reasonable format, Lamberts means that some clinical summaries generated by EHR systems do not give the information the right way to patients after a visit. Another barrier to generating a


clinical summary is the impact it has on clinician behavior. Lamberts explained


IMAGE © FOTOLIA CONNECTION/HEALTHCARE IT 2012.Q4 27


that generating a clinical summary will likely cause a change in provider workflow. In an effort to achieve a meaningful summary, a provider may alter care tactics in order to produce a comprehensive summary. This is a process that can ultimately add more work—a worrisome proposition for caregivers with productivity loss in mind. For example, if a patient does not understand a clinical summary they’ve received, the provider will have to spell out the details, and that takes time.


Developing a Template Lamberts took matters into his


own hands by creating a handout that details what patients need and want to know after a visit. The reason for the handout was to ensure Lamberts’ care routine goes unchanged. Some of the handout questions are as follows: What was the diagnosis? • What is the plan? • Were any tests, labs, or consults ordered?


• Were any medications started or stopped?


The questions, it turns out, are components of a meaningful clinical summary. The handout, said Lamberts in the article, is easy to read on the patient’s end. Furthermore, the clinical summary as a whole has “become the culmination of the visit—something tangible that patients get for their time and money.” He added that, with his process, he communicates better and patients are happier.


Is This Right for You? This process shows that generating


clinical summaries takes much more planning than just relying on an EHR system to produce one. That said, should more providers create a similar handout? That’s debatable. After all, it may take more work to create one.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36