This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Figure.8


an integrated naval architecture design and analysis soſtware produced by Qinetiq. Its object based description of the ship design, interactivity and extensibility made it the most suitable tool for use in the demonstration. Product model specifications can be very


detailed, allowing their direct implementation in software tools etc. The aim within the FIREPROOF demonstration was not to develop such a detailed specification, but rather to identify the contents, concepts and modelling techniques that would be required of a future more detailed specification. Tis development was carried out by a process of increasing focus and detail, which also contributed to the division of labour in the


Figure.10 Figure.9


demonstration activity. Figure 7 provides a summary of the process of survey and grouping used, including the consideration of the use of the FIREPROOF methodology in the ship design process, which constrains the amount of detail available at a given point in the design development.


Demonstration Te SPM and interface tools were used as part of the modelling process to allow a campaign of simulations to be carried out. Figure 8 shows the Paramarine model, which represented two zones of a generic cruise ship. Tis model contained 2451 objects, including 1263 spaces and 1117 connectivity items. Figure 9 shows this geometry transferred to SMARTFIRE Scenario Designer, Figure 10


shows it in maritimeEXODUS and Figure 11 is an isometric view of a single deck in SMARTFIRE.


Conclusions The FIREPROOF project is developing a probabilistic, risk-based approach to fire safety for passenger ships allowing the rational assessment of risk for both conventional and novel designs. Tis project has seen the development of modelling and analysis tools addressing all aspects of fire, from ignition to spread and consequences for the passengers and crew. To support these analyses, including simulations using a new hybrid CFD / Zone model, the basis specification for a Ship Product Model (SPM) has been developed. Ultimately, the FIREPROOF framework will be submitted to IMO (FP sub-committee) for discussion and further consideration. NA


Dr. Richard Pawling, Research Assistant, Design Research Centre, UCL Dr. Angus Grandison, Senior Research Fellow, Fire Safety Engineering Group, University of Greenwich Dr. Philipp Lohrmann, Research Scientist, BMT Group Dr. George Mermiris, Research Associate, Ship Stability Research Centre, University of Strathclyde Claudia Pereira Dias, Fire Safety Specialist, ISQ, Portugal.


Figure.11 The Naval Architect October 2012 43


Feature 2


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72