Languages Continued from page 29
languages are given a much lower priority and sometimes even ignored altogether. The English-speaking countries studied (the USA and Australia) offered a more diverse range of languages in primary education but at the same time were less successful at achieving widespread coverage: in both countries the trend is towards shrinkage of primary languages provision, in contrast to expansion elsewhere.
The curriculum time allotted to language learning varies widely depending on the goals and expectations of foreign language education. English-speaking countries dedicate the least amount of time to foreign language learning and this is associated with low expectations about standards of achievement.
Linking foreign languages to other curriculum areas reflects good primary pedagogy in that learning is holistic, allowing children to transfer and reinforce knowledge and skills between curriculum areas. It can also be seen as efficient in that it allows for more exposure to the foreign language without taking time away from other subjects.
The quality of the teaching force is a key concern in research regarding the effectiveness of teaching new languages to young children. Education systems the world over face a common challenge in training enough teachers with expertise in both the language they are teaching and in pedagogies appropriate to young children.
The introduction of languages in primary schools is frequently inadequately planned for in terms of teacher supply and training. Teachers are central to the success of primary languages and serious investment needs to be set aside for their training and development. A clear picture is required at the outset of who is going to teach the new language, and their training needs in both age-appropriate pedagogy and competence in the language being taught.
The level of language competence needed by teachers is dependent on the teaching goals and approaches used, but it is good practice to specify it, as many countries do.
A relatively low level of competence can, in some circumstances, be compensated for by excellent methodology, but however good a teacher’s knowledge of the language they are teaching, they still need to understand primary pedagogy and how teaching a foreign language to primary-age children is different from teaching older pupils. This explains why the favoured solution to teacher provision for primary foreign languages is to provide training in the language and language teaching to generalist primary teachers. Despite this, countries often employ an eclectic approach to supplying needs. In many countries the ongoing needs in terms of both teacher supply and CPD have been overlooked once the initial push for implementation has been completed. They should not be underestimated. International programmes and opportunities for bilateral collaboration should be exploited to the full as primary languages teachers could derive huge benefit from these for their professional development. In England, the need to manage the transition between the primary and secondary phases has long been seen as crucial to the success of any primary foreign languages initiative.
The report looked at the spectrum of issues involved in providing for
continuity and some ways in which these have been addressed. It found that unequal or inconsistent provision for primary languages presents
“Governments have a key role in ensuring that curricula for primary and secondary foreign language learning are designed as a unified whole, and that they set out high expectations of progression throughout the system”
a problem for secondary schools who are then unable to build on what children already know. It also exacerbates social inequality. A clear national statement covering language teaching from primary through to secondary, setting out expectations on what pupils are expected to achieve at each stage, is a prerequisite for avoiding wastage and frustration in the system. National or state-wide guidance is essential in providing a framework for continuity, but there is also a need for shared understanding and liaison at school and local level.
Governments have a key role in ensuring that curricula for primary and
secondary foreign language learning are designed as a unified whole, and that they set out high expectations of progression throughout the system. They can also ensure that teacher training for languages builds bridges between primary and secondary practice. They can set expectations regarding liaison between primary and secondary schools and help to remove barriers to this happening – but the onus is on schools and on action at local level to put this into practice. The issue of continuity is therefore a fundamental challenge to be addressed at all levels in the system.
There is a particular challenge in achieving continuity while at the same time offering a diverse range of languages and choice to pupils. Given the widespread expectation that Anglophone education systems should cater for a much wider range of languages than currently, this is an issue which deserves more detailed investigation and a review of the options and solutions which could be applied from primary through to university. The assumption that English-speakers do not need to learn other languages because others are learning ours is seriously flawed, not only on instrumental economic grounds but on educational ones. However, evidence from around the world shows that English education systems institute less compulsion, dedicate less time and generally provide less resource and encouragement for language learning than other high performing education systems. Given the educational, intellectual, cultural and literacy benefits of learning another language, and in particular starting language learning early, this represents a severe impoverishment of our education. If we are to raise our sights and set high standards for what children should be able to do by the time they leave secondary school, we need a carefully planned, adequately resourced early start to language learning as part of a coherent programme reaching through primary school to secondary and beyond.
• Teresa Tinley from Alcanta Communications and Therese Comfort, languages education lead for primary with the CfBT Education Trust are authors of the CfBT report Lessons from Abroad: An international review of primary languages.
Further information Lessons from Abroad: An international review of primary languages
www.cfbt.com/evidenceforeducation/our_research/evidence_for_ government/international_policy_reforms/published_research_reports/
lessons_from_abroad.aspx
30
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48