Trans RINA, Vol 154, Part A2, Intl J Maritime Eng, Apr-Jun 2012


measurements will be able to be fed into theoretical models, and improved propeller and hull designs.


7. 1.


2. 3. REFERENCES


PAYNE R., WEBB, D. Orientation by means of long range acoustic signalling in baleen whales. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 188:110-142, 1971


MITSON, R.B., KNUDSEN, H.P. Causes and effects of underwater noise on fish abundance estimation. Aquatic Living Resources 16(3):255-263, 2003.


DE ROBERTIS, A., WILSON, C. D. Silent ships sometimes do encounter more fish. 2. Concurrent echosounder observations from a free drifting buoy and vessels. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67: 996–1003, 2010


4. 5.


WYSOCKI, L. E., DITTAMI, J. P., LADICH, F. Ship noise and cortisol secretion in European freshwater fishes. Biol. Conserv. 128: 501-508, 2006


VASCONCELOS, R.O., AMORIM, M.C., LADICH, F. Effects of ship noise on the detectability of communication signals in the Lusitanian toadfish. Journal of Experimental Biology 210:2104-2112, 2007


6.


ANDREW, R.K., HOWE, B.M., MERCER, J.A., DZIECIUCH, M.A. Ocean ambient sound: comparing the 1960’s with the 1990s for a receiver off the California coast. ARLO 3:65-70, 2002.


7.


MCDONALD, M.A., HILDEBRAND, J.A., WIGGINS, S.M. Increases in deep ocean ambient noise in the Northeast Pacific west of San Nicolas Island, California. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120:711-718, 2006


8. 9. 10.


HILDEBRAND, J. Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 395:5-20, 2009


ROSS, D., Ship Sources of Ambient Noise. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 30(2):257-261, 2005


HATCH, L, CLARK, C, MERRICK, R, VAN PARIJS, S, PONIRAKIS, D, SCHWEHR, K, THOMPSON, M, WILEY, D. Characterising the relative contributions of large vessels to total ocean noise fields: a case study using the Gerry E Studds Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary. Environmental Management 42:735- 752, 2008


11.


CLARK, C.W., ELLISON, W.T., SOUTHALL, B.L., HATCH, L., VAN PARIJS, S.M. FRANKE, A., PONIKARIES, D. Acoustic masking in marine ecosystems: intuitions, analysis and implication. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 395:201-222, 2009


12.


INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION. Minimizing the introduction of incidental noise from commercial shipping operations into the marine environment to


17.


reduce potential adverse impacts on marine life. Paper MEPC 58/19 submitted by the United States to 58th session of IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee, October 2008.


13. WRIGHT, A.J. (ed). International Workshop on Shipping Noise and Marine Mammals, Hamburg, Germany, 21-24 April 2008. Okeanos Foundation for the Sea, Auf der Marienhohe 15, D64297 Darmstadt, 2008.


14. 15. 16.


INTERNATIONAL WHALING COMMISSION. Report of the Scientific Committee. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management 11(suppl.):47, 2009.


INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION. Report of the 58th session of IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee, October 2008.


SOUTHALL B.L. Shipping noise and marine mammals: a forum for science, management, and technology. Final Report of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) International Symposium. U.S. NOAA Fisheries, Arlington, Virginia, May 18–19, 2004. Available at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/acoustics/shi pping_noise.pdf, 2005


SOUTHALL, B.L., SCHOLIK-SCHLOMER, A. Final report of the NOAA International Conference: “Potential Application of Vessel- Quieting Technology on Large Commercial Vessels,” 1-2 May, 2007, Silver Spring, MD, U.S.A. 2008


18.


INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION. Noise from commercial shipping and its adverse impacts on marine life. Report of the Correspondence Group. Paper MEPC 61/19 presented to IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee, July 2010.


19. WALES, S.C., HEITMEYER, R.M. An ensemble source spectra model for merchant ship-radiated J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111 (3):1211- 1231, 2002.


20.


LEAPER, R., RENILSON, M., FRANK, V., PAPASTAVROU, V. Possible steps towards reducing impacts of shipping noise. 5pp. Paper SC/61/E19 to IWC Scientific Committee, Madeira, Portugal, 2009


21.


KIPPLE, B. Underwater acoustic signatures of six cruise ships that sail Southeast Alaska. Measured at Southeast Alaksa Acoustic Measurement Facility. Naval Surface Warfare center –Detachment Bremerton Technical Report NSWCCD-71-TR-2002/574. 2002.


22. 23.


CARLTON, JS, DABBS, E. The influence of ship underwater noise emissions on marine mammals. Lloyd’s Register Technology Day Proceedings, February 2009.


INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION. Resolution MEPC.203(62).


A-86


©2012: The Royal Institution of Naval Architects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62