This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
INDUSTRY CONNECTIONS Wheelchair Securement Study


‘First of Its Kind’ New research from the University of Pittsburgh’s Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center


on Wheelchair Transportation Safety shows that participants favor rear-facing wheelchair passenger systems and independent use versus operator assistance. Published in the Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, the study was designed to evaluate security, ease of use, comfort and independent use of three types of wheelchair securement systems in a large


accessible transit vehicle (LATV). Researchers compared the usability of a prototype auto-docking system and prototype rear- facing wheelchair passenger (RF-WP) system with the traditional four-point tie-down system. Te latter system is typically used with wheelchairs on school buses and adheres to WC19 safety standards established by RESNA. In the study, 20 participants took a 15-minute city ride before completing a survey, which also sought input from wheelchair


and scooter users on how to improve LATV securement systems. Among key findings was the importance of independent use versus operator assistance and the participants’ preference to face forward while traveling. Participants responded positively to the auto-docking and RF-WP systems, saying they were quicker and easier to use and allowed more independent use than the four-point tie-down system. “Tis is the first study of its kind to evaluate users’ opinions on various types of wheelchair securement systems for use in LATVs,” wrote the authors.


Los Angeles Request for Lawsuit Blocked in Wake of State Budget Cuts Slashing Student Transportation In late December, a judge rejected a Los Angeles Unified School


District (LAUSD) request to immediately halt massive state funding cuts, but the district vowed to continue providing transportation to 52,000 students, according to news reports. Superior Court Judge Ann Jones denied the temporary restraining


order sought by LAUSD to restore $38 million in transportation funds that were included in “trigger” cuts announced by Gov. Jerry Brown just 10 days before. With state revenue $2.2 billion less than forecasted, the


governor enacted $1 billion in midyear cuts that took effect Jan. 1. LAUSD responded by filing a lawsuit alleging that California violated the state Constitution when it enacted the trigger cut that is eliminating $248 million in student transportation funding statewide for the remainder of the current school year. LAUSD called the cuts “devastating” because they would deplete


50 percent of its transportation budget after half a year’s worth of transportation services were already provided.


Only two options remain, according to the district: terminate transportation services or divert classroom funding from the general


fund to pay for the mandated school busing. Te district is required to provide transportation to some 48,000 students each day, including 13,000 students with special needs who receive bus service under federal and state law. In addition, a 1981 desegregation order requires the district to bus 35,000 students to magnet schools and similar programs. LAUSD also stated that allocating classroom funds to pay for transportation violates the California Constitution “because further


budget cuts would adversely impact the educational benefits offered to its students.” However, the district also said it would find a way to keep transportation programs alive.


16 School Transportation News Magazine February 2012


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60