This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Exploration • Drilling • Field Services


63 per cent to 65 per cent is not recoverable at present by using traditional recovery methods. Tere are three methods of EOR:


● Termal recovery/steam injection. ● Chemical injection / polymer injection. ● Gas injection: natural gas, carbon dioxide, nitrogen.


EOR techniques are applied to: ● Decrease the viscosity difference between the oil and water phases.


● Reduce interfacial forces holding the oil in pores within the rock formation.


● Modify the reservoir and oil properties to make the oil more easily released and produced, that is improve sweep efficiency.


Termal EOR employs high pressure steam or in some cases in-situ combustion. Tis technique is favoured for the displacement of heavy oil. Chemical EOR involves injection of interfacial


active components, such as surfactants, polymers and alkalis. Te mechanism of oil displacement is obtained through the creation of ultra-low surface tension. Gas injection, the most-widely used approach


today, utilises high pressure carbon dioxide, nitrogen or hydrocarbon gas to generate miscibility, thus increasing oil volumes and decreasing oil viscosity. Tere are a number of advantages associated with the adoption of EOR techniques; not only can EOR prolong the life of a depleting field by up to 30 years when correctly employed on proven reserves, but it can also save the costs of finding a replacement field. As many fields around the world are starting to reach the end of their productive life, EOR represents the solution to sustain production levels and meet the increasing demand for oil.


First trials Te first export of Omani oil took place on 27 July 1967. Initially oil production rose steadily to 341 000 barrels per day in 1975 and in 1984 the average daily production reached 400 000 barrels a day. However, aware of the low recoverability factor of its fields due to a complex geology, Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) – the largest oilfield operator in the Sultanate – started a series of EOR trials in 1986. Te trials proved successful and Oman moved swiftly to implement EOR, boosting production to 714 300bpd in 2008 before enhanced oil recovery methods were implemented and to a current level of nearly 900 000bpd with EOR techniques. EOR projects commonly yield between 5-15 per cent incremental reserves and PDO expects its EOR projects to contribute around


35 per cent of its total production by 2020. For this reason Oman is seen by many as pushing the limits of EOR technology.


Steam injection Qarn Alam is the world’s first full field EOR project and also the largest of its kind in the world. A sophisticated EOR technique called thermally assisted gas oil gravity drainage (TAGOGD) is employed due to characteristics of the fractured carbonate reservoir where the oil is highly viscous and a very low percentage of recovery is feasible by conventional oil extraction method. Te US$1.2bn facility comprises a water


treatment plant producing 24 000 tonnes per day of boiler feed water, using reverse osmosis and a steam generation facility producing 18 000 tonnes per day of steam, using heat recovery steam generators (HRSG). Te application of EOR is adding 60 000 bpd, and 1.2MMSCMD of gas to the original output.


Polymer injection Marmul field is located in south Oman. Marmul field is characterised by heavy viscous crude that is difficult to extract by traditional recovery methods. Te reservoir has a viscosity of around 90Cp. To improve the reservoir’s sweep efficiency, water is viscosified by the addition of polyacrylamide polymers and then injected in the reservoir through polymer injection wells. Te polymer flooding at Marmul field will add a further 8000 bpd. Te implementation of this technique will lead to an estimated 10 per cent to 15 per cent increase in recovery levels from the Marmul reservoirs. ●


Enter 23 or ✔ at www.engineerlive.com/iog


Vinod Shah is Managing Director, Mott MacDonald & Company LLC, Sultanate of Oman. www.mottmac.com


www.engineerlive.com 23


Fig. 2. View of the Marmul polymer injection facility.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74