This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
EIFS STUCCO ON STEROIDS
Stucco is well-known building product in many regions of the country, but you can get the same stucco look with more insulation value by using EIFS (exterior insulation finish system).


A recent Oak Ridge National Laboratory study looked at how EIFS walls stacked up against brick, glass, stucco, concrete, wood and masonry. EIFS posted a higher R-value than the others at R-12.9.


EIFS can control temperature and moisture within the wall system and outperforms many other claddings. Because it is applied to the outside of a home, it is an option for both new homes and retrofits. The product’s carbon footprint as compared with other common claddings is five times lower than brick and three times lower than stucco, says a National Institute of Standards and Technology analysis. EIFS is commonly thought of as a stucco-look product, but finishes are quite flexible. Dryvit Outsulation system comes in Custom Brick and “Lymestone” finishes, and BASF has an attractive “AnticoGlaze” finish, reminiscent of the Tuscany region in Italy. GB


VIRTUES
> Adds insulation to the exterior of a home
> Finishes other than stucco look available
> Less expensive than stucco
> Liquid applied barrier blocks moisture
CAVEATS
> Imperative that it be installed and flashed correctly
> Must be installed by a trained professional
> Can dent and crack if hit by a ball or other object


 


AN EIFS UPGRADE?


An Exterior Insulation and Finish System is a straightforward way to upgrade the R-value of a wood or steel-framed wall without tearing out the existing insulation and starting over. The invention of high-tech moisture wraps has made these systems far more foolproof, in our view.


The EIFS concept is simple (described in the text above), but its benefits can be multi-faceted. Along with an R-value increase of up to R-10 (with 2” of rigid foam), the upgraded wall typically has much lower air infiltration. Both factors reduce heating and cooling demand in the home significantly.—Editor


11.2011
28

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84