This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
Developing the Business case


This article postulates that exploring the underlying theoretical considerations of the research problem opens up a broader understanding of the real business issues. Developing a business case therefore goes hand in hand with understanding and reviewing the theoretical considerations underlying the business research problem through the exploitation of appropriate business management models and the underlying theory related to the models.


Management models have mostly been developed to exploit business realities and to open up business issues that are not immediately obvious. Segal-Horn (2004) refers to these management models as frameworks. It is suggested here that the appropriate exploitation of management models and related theory can, and often does, yield valuable business considerations, that would not easily otherwise be identified. Much of this is due to the fact that models have inherent dynamics that need to be


Environmental change The risk of strategic drift


Strategic change 3 1 Phase 1 Incremental change TIME 2 Phase 2 flux 4


Phase 3/4 transformational change or demise


Fig 1 Risk of Strategic Drift Johnson, (2004)


contextually researched if the full potential of their exploitation is to be achieved within a specific business environment.


As an example of model exploitation consider a research problem where change management is one of the underlying related research issues. The related literature review on change management will of course unravel a degree of understanding on Change management but this will not necessarily be contextually related to the business issues of the organisation in which the research is being carried out.


A review of change management issues within the organisation itself, using relevant change management models, will unravel a number of underlying issues not only of potential value to the organisation itself, but also serves to inform the research instrument (questionnaire and or interview protocol). The following example demonstrates:


AMOUNT OF CHANGE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142