This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
consider. If the client has chosen someone who is green at trial or decides not to pur- sue a line of questioning, there is nothing I can do. At the extreme end, the attorney’s handling of the case may be malpractice. • Attorney malpractice It isn’t uncommon for the client to


wonder why he or she lost at trial. There are times when the client will ask about an appeal but the real remedy is an action for attorney malpractice. If the attorney has committed malpractice, then the client’s remedy is beyond the reach of an appeal.


Generally issues cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. As a general rule, an appellant can-


not assert a new theory for the first time on appeal. This rule is based on fairness and incorporates principles of estoppel and waiver. Of course, such a rule has profound implications for appellants and their trial attorneys. There are exceptions to this rule,


such as when the new issue involves a mat- ter of law as applied to undisputed facts. (Brown v. Boren (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1303, 1316.) “Only when the issue pre- sented involves purely a legal question, on an uncontroverted record and requires no fac- tual determinations, is it appropriate to address new theories.” (Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co. (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 820, 847; italics in original.) The appellate court may also exercise


its discretion and consider constitutional issues raised for the first time on appeal “especially when . . . the asserted error fundamentally affects the validity of the judgment . . . or important issues of pub- lic policy are at issue . . .” (County of Orange v. Ivansco (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 328, 331, fn. 2.)


Conclusion An obstacle doesn’t necessarily mean


an appellant can’t win on appeal. Obviously, appellants win enough of the time to make an appeal a worthwhile gamble; however, obstacles need to be considered and disclosed to the client. If the client chooses to move forward with the appeal, at least the client can make an informed decision.


JULY 2011 The Advocate Magazine — 73


Donna Bader, a certified appellate special-


ist, has practiced for over 30 years in Orange County. She is the former editor of Advocate and Plaintiff magazines and the author of a


new book, An Appeal to Reason: 204 Strategic Tools to Help You Win Your Appeal at Trial. www.anappealtoreason.com.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104