This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
of the pollution into the lake, while fishing villages account for 15 per cent and industries for 8 per cent. Further research (Hutton and others 2007) attributed the rising levels of pollution in Kampala to: • Poor sewerage infrastructure, including leaking old sewer pipes, and poorly constructed and managed septic tanks and sewage treatment works contaminating ground and surface water; and


• Wide use of pit latrines, especially in the slums, contributing to pollution of surface and groundwater in the high water table areas of Kampala.


IMPROVING KAMPALA’S WATER AND SANITATION SERVICES


Established in 1972, the National Water and Sewerage Corporation (NWSC) sought to address the need for improved water and sanitation service delivery in the major urban centres of Uganda. Over the years the NWSC faced operational and financial challenges, including high volumes of unaccounted-for water, caused mainly by leakages and illegal connections, and accounting for 60 per cent of all treated water. The utility was also overstaffed, with the salaries and wages bill accounting for 64 per cent of the total operating costs (Baieti and others 2006).


Through reforms that started in 1998, the utility managed to rehabilitate the water and sewerage infrastructure, and to increase water production capacity. To further consolidate and improve performance, the NWSC headquarters later entered into Area Performance Contracts with its subsidiary utilities to increase managerial autonomy, introduce performance incentives and hold the subsidiary operators more accountable. In addition to improving safe water access and sanitation services by the poor, the reforms were also designed to encourage (Baieti and others 2006): • Simplification by reducing bureaucracy; • Motivation in order to improve the speed of work with clarity of expectations;


• Participation so as to increase worker involvement and self confidence;


• Transformation by removing organizational boundaries; and • Prioritization by setting appropriate performance targets and rewarding progress.


According to Mugisha and others (2004), NWSC reforms resulted in improved staff productivity with the ratio of staff costs to


46


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72