CONSTRUCTION FIXINGS
Standards on Powder Actuated Tools coming soon
Barbara Sorgato, secretary to the European Consortium of Anchor Producers, and these days a regular participant in European standards development, provides a ‘heads up’ on forthcoming regulatory changes on Powder Actuated Tools… and a word of warning for companies that allow others to take the initiative.
S
oon Powder Actuated Tools (PAT) and their components – fixing cartridges and nails for PAT – will be obliged to have the CE marking. The legal history of Powder Actuated Tools and their components is very peculiar. Powder Actuated Tools have been present on the European
market since the 1940s. Before they enter the market, Powder Actuated Tools as well as cartridges have always been proofed according to the technical requirements set up by the Permanent International Commission for Firearms Testing - commonly abbreviated as C.I.P. CIP tests
are not considered as European norms, so, no European CE marking on PAT and on fixing cartridges has ever been possible. To
obtain the CE marking, as a matter of fact, first of all one must relate a product with an EU Directive, then one has to have an EU technical standard. Let’s see what happened for PATs and their components.
Powder Actuated Tools In 2006 the Machinery Directive was revised. It also included
Powder Actuated Tools. Consequently, the European Commission gave a mandate to CEN to issue a standard for Powder Actuated Tools. The standard was drawn up by the group CEN/TC/213, WG 1, which started to work in 2007. The working team was composed of the companies represented
by ECAP, Hilti, Spit/ITW and by some advisors and national marking bodies. The regulation was finished in 2009, and the CE marking for
Powder Actuated Tools will be possible starting from October 2011 and will be mandatory from 2013.
Fixing cartridges Cartridges for powder actuated fastening tools, as well as
pretensioners for seatbelts and airbags, fall under the definition of a pyrotechnic article. So, in 2009 they were included in the work programme of CEN TC 212, WG 5, where harmonised
standards for pyrotechnic articles are developed. The working team was composed of the companies represented by ECAP, Hilti, and by ammunitions producers. The standard is currently under CEN approval, and it is expected to be published within 2011.
Nails for PAT Nails fall under the Construction Products Regulation.
They are ruled by CEN standards, but these do not take into consideration nails with the so called ‘ballistic point’, that is to say those used for PATs. In the last years, two non-standard PAT nails – “Powder
actuated fasteners for the fixings of insulation materials” and “cartridge fired pins”, have obtained a Common Understanding for Assessment Procedure (CUAP). A CUAP is a very important tool for the European market: it
is a procedure for innovative products which are not covered by any harmonised European specification, and it allows firms to place on the market their products with a CE marking, without waiting for the time required to make a standard (usually more than 2 years). A new CUAP for standard PAT nails, “Power-actuated fastener
for multiple use in concrete for non-structural applications”, has recently been drafted by DIBt, the German EOTA Approval Body, in cooperation with three nails producers, and it is waiting for the final endorsement. Starting from 2011 CE marked standard PAT nails will have
to comply with this CUAP. What does this imply? The text of the CUAP is not public, but some basic information is available: only nails made of stainless steel are admitted for external use; nails must be tested also on slotted concrete, following a principle similar to that of anchors; just like CIP, also CUAP implies a closed system of “tool-cartridge-nail”. According to the principle: no component can be standardised. So, every brand of nail must be tested on every PAT model. It is like saying, for instance: before using a Michelin tyre, I must test its compatibility with every single car model by Fiat, Ford, Audi, etc. One can discuss how to make a CUAP more consumer
friendly, but there is something, which is more important: are these companies really aware of the existence and potentialities offered by this powerful normative instrument? How many companies are able to take advantage of the fact that who comes first defines the technical specification of their own product, and consequently the market rules?
So, European companies, do not just stand there… take the initiative!
Who comes later will not have the task and burden of drawing-
up the normative text, but, if he wants to get the CE marking, he will have to comply with your rules. And that means much.
86 Fastener + Fixing Magazine • Issue 68 March 2011
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164