This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Health & Safety


circumference. Tese bypass conductors should be as short as possible and evenly spaced around the roof perimeter. Since modifications 1 and 2 require the overhaul


of new and existing tank designs and can cost up to $1 million per tank, implementing these is less than ideal. To implement submerged shunts, for instance, each tank has to be emptied and personnel must go inside both above and below the roof to make modifications. Because the shunts are submerged, they would be hard to inspect and maintain. Insulating seal components and poles would also require substantial design changes and field modifications, with inspection and maintenance issues. Because modification 3, the installation of bypass conductors, can be implemented immediately and costs less than $10 000 per tank, it’s a readily viable option for petroleum companies. Existing tanks can be retrofitted with bypass conductors while still in service regardless of roof level. To meet the bypass conductor requirements, tank


owners can choose between a traditional fixed- length conductor and an innovative retractable conductor, wound on a spring-tensioned reel. Fixed-length conductors such as loose cable have the drawback, however, of high impedance and poor conductivity when the FRT roof is high. An FRT is most at-risk from lightning when the roof is high since when the tank is full or near full, lightning current flows are concentrated in the shunts directly below the strike location. When the tank roof is low, lightning current disperses and is more evenly distributed among the available roof-shell bonds. In contrast, retractable bypass conductors will always be as short as possible, and offer substantially less impedance when the FRT roof is high. For instance, the Retractable Grounding Assembly (RGA) by Lightning Eliminators & Consultants (LEC), can offer just one-sixth the impedance of traditional fixed-length cable on a 50 foot tall tank. To satisfy these requirements, LEC developed the


RGA which provides a very low impedance, direct connection between the tank roof and shell, using a wide thick-braided wire cable, spring-loaded on a heavy stainless steel reel. It is easy to install on new and existing tanks, as well as easy to inspect, test, and maintain. With impedance of one ohm or less - compared with shunts or walkway ladders with impedance as high as 500 ohms - the RGA offers a reliable, full- time grounding connection that can help prevent


lightning or static discharge-related petroleum fires. Te RGA’s path of impedance is kept to a practical minimum by a combination of the shortest path, wide braid, and constant spring tension. Its spring-loaded reel extends cable as the roof descends, and retracts it as the roof rises - so the line remains taut at the minimal distance needed for grounding, assuring minimal impedance and faster, more reliable grounding.


Unlike traditional roof-shell bonding methods, the RGA’s wide braid maximizes surface area and therefore conductivity, since high frequency electrical charges (electrons) actually travel most effectively along the surfaces of wire conductors. Te RGA cable, constructed from 864 strands of #30 AWG copper wire, is braided together to form a strap 1.625-in wide by 0.11-in thick, and is tinned for extra corrosion protection. With over twice the surface area of typical 0.5-in diameter or 250 MCM roof-shell bonding cable, for instance, the RGA offers significantly better conductivity. Since the RGA functions independently of the condition of the tank shell, it can eliminate the need for more traditional roof-shell bonding methods like shunts, or serve as a more effective primary safety system for preventing lightning or static discharge- related fire hazard. Unlike a walkway ladder or single roof-shell bonding cable, multiple RGAs can be used to ensure multiple positive bonds between the tank shell and roof, and the lowest likelihood of arcing at a seal. l


Del Williams is with Lightning Eliminators & Consultants, Inc is based in Boulder, Colorado, USA. www.lecglobal.com


www.engineerlive.com 43


Fig. 2. A large plume of smoke across portions of the greater Kansas City metro area.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56