This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
team for a young man who killed an- other young man in self-defense. The jury did ultimately acquit him on the killing, but he spent roughly two years waiting in jail because there was no bond on the crime he was charged with, murder. The jurisdiction: “gun- friendly” Florida. About a month before this, I was


Mas has been expert wit- ness in shooting cases for over 30 years, and a police officer longer than that. He has found some self-defense advice to be shockingly bad.


in court testifying on behalf of a hus- band and father who shot two people who had come onto his property and attacked him and his wife in the pres- ence of their child. After two hung juries, charges were dismissed. The venue: “gun-friendly” Arizona. A few years ago, I spoke for a cop


who was charged with murder after shooting a man who was lunging at a brother officer with a knife. Fortu- nately, we were able to convince the jury it was indeed a justified shooting, and the jurors acquitted him on all counts. Where: “gun-friendly” Texas. Of course, you’ll also sometimes


How you handle the incident, both during and after, will usually mat- ter more to the outcome than whether your choice of S&W M&P was 18-round 9mm or 5-shot .357.


see the opposite: a proper verdict rendered in a self-defense case in one of the jurisdictions that are usually seen as “anti-gun.” The general at- mosphere in New York City is anti- gun and anti-self-defense, yet in a recent case a man who stabbed two attackers to death in the subway was no billed by a grand jury there because they were convinced the de- fendant had acted in self-defense. In anti-gun Los Angeles, I spoke for a man who had fired in self-defense and the jury agreed, acquitting the defendant of all charges. In another case I’m familiar with, the District Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles de- termined a woman was justified in shooting to death the man who at- tempted to rape her. The point is, you can’t predict


whether you’ll go to trial, or what the predisposition of your jury will be, based on public opinion polls or the mood of the State Legislature. It sim- ply doesn’t work that way. “It Doesn’t Matter What I Shoot Him With.”


It may not matter to you — it may


James Yeager, left, and Mas, in Tucson to testify for a man who fired in self-defense and was charged with Aggravated Assault. Don’t assume it can’t happen in “gun-friendly states” such as Arizona.


62


not matter to me — but we’d be fools to think that it won’t matter to those who accuse us, even if the accusation is a wrongful one. A prosecutor who needs to establish mens rea – mean- ing literally “guilty mind,” which can be either criminal intent or willful, wanton disregard for human life and safety — is allowed broad latitude to do exactly that. In some ways, a plain- tiff’s lawyer in civil court is allowed to reach even further to show you to be in the wrong. We live in a society where much of


the public believes if you own a high- performance sports car, you must be


REALITY CHECK • 2011 SPECIAL EDITION


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164