This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
the area below the curve ni ∆T≤ ∆Tm,i


(l) ( Fig. 2a). Although, ∆Tm than for the inoculated melt, ∆Tmi the curve n(l) for lm


From the graphite nucleation potential curves the following arguments on graphite nucleation can be made. Consider two melts (base and inoculated irons). For the base melt, the nucleation potential is given by the curve n(l) which is rela- tively small when compared with that for inoculated iron, ni


≤ l ≤ ∞, (0 ≤ ∆T≤ ∆Tm


). In turn, this indicates that during solidification the inoculated melt contains a higher nuclei density than the base melt.


(l) in the range lm,i


Several factors are known to influence the graphite nu- cleation potential of iron melts. Among these factors are; (a) the chemical composition, (b) the charge materials, (c) the charge sequence, (d) precondition of melts,25


(e) tem-


perature/time ratio, (f) iron handling and (g) inoculation and spheroidization practice. In addition, the presence and amount of various reaction products (i.e., Mn + S = MnS), furnace atmosphere and type of slag, type of furnace, all af- fect the graphite nucleation potential of iron melts. Since each nucleation site gives rise to a single graphite nodule or eutectic cell, the expected nodule, NV,n


Thus, the graphite nucleation potential of iron melts can be directly determined from the nodule or eutectic cell count and indirectly by the nucleation coefficients Ns


be described by the nuclei count (Eqn. 8) Nnuc = NV


count can = NV,n


. , and b.


Discussion Technological Factors


In general, the cell or nodule count depends on the melt graphite nucleation potential (metallurgical quality of liquid iron) and on the cooling rate. The effect of technological fac- tors on the cell or nodule count can be estimated26


using the


following expressions: For flake graphite cast iron:


Equation 11


The cell or nodule counts given by Eqns. (11 and 12) are given per unit volume (cm,-3


mm-3 For ductile cast iron: Equation 12


Where; the Product Log(x) = y is the Lambert function, also known as the Omega function graphically shown in Fig.4. This function can be easily determined following the instruction ProductLog[x] in the Mathematica™ program. Thus, in the above equations:


International Journal of Metalcasting/Summer 10


Equations (1-3) are used for unit conversions. Chemical Composition Effects


foundry practice where they are given per unit area cm-2 mm.-2


), this in contrast with the or


after pouring into the mold, a is the mold material ability to absorb heat, Vc


z = 0.41 + 0.93 B Moreover, Ti


or cell, NV and M is the casting modulus:


Equation 17 Equation 18 Equation 19 Equation 20


Equation 21


the casting, respectively, s is the wall thickness and d is the diameter of the cylindrical casting. The other parameters are defined in Table 1.


is the initial temperature of the cast iron just and Fc


are the volume and surface area of


for the base melt is higher (Fig. 2b) the area below ) is smaller than ≤ l ≤ ∞, (0 ≤


Where; Q and Qn


Equation 13


Equation 14


are the casting cooling rates of flake graph- ite and ductile iron, respectively at the graphite eutectic equilibrium temperature Ts.


Equation 15


Equation 16


The main indicator related to the effect of chemical com- position in cast iron is the carbon equivalent, CE = C + 0.33Si. In general, there is limited information on the rela- tion between the technological factors and the magnitude of the nucleation coefficients, Ns


available data regarding the influence of CE on Ns


and b. Table 2 gives the and b.


39


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81