This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
CIBSE national conference

Concern over clients adopting ‘minimum compliance’

ENFORCEMENT

n

Commercial buildings have ended up with lower energy

performance ratings than they deserve because owners were not prepared for their introduction. That’s the view of John Field of consultancy Power Efficiency, who told delegates that he was aware of buildings that could have had a B-rating but instead received a D because the owners simply did not have all the required information available. Field also pointed to figures

from Landmark, the body which compiles the database of energy- performance and display-energy certificates (EPCs and DECs). The data shows that there had not been the expected upsurge in renewals of DECs since last October, the month

enforcement of DECs in public buildings by the authorities, and said that corporate and commercial property owners were showing only moderate to low levels of compliance with the EPC regime. Examples of this attitude included the use of ‘drive-by’ EPC services that provided ‘unlikely’ ratings. There was also a problem of

John Field... too little enforcement.

which marked the first anniversary of the scheme. Monthly registrations of DECs

have steadily declined – from 3,636 in October 2009 to 1,495 in April this year, according to the figures. Field criticised the lack of

office blocks receiving inadequate DEC ratings because the benchmarks do not reflect of the level occupancy density in the buildings. However, there is a ‘huge opportunity’ for the energy performance sector to engage with top management of companies about the compliance, Field added. ‘However, we also need active enforcement of the energy certificates, including fines for non-compliance.’

Give children the knowledge

BIG IDEA

CIBSE is to lobby the new government to introduce a policy chosen by CIBSE members. A number of ‘big ideas’ on

tackling Britain’s energy problems were proposed and voted on by members, and the winning policy was announced at the conference. This demands that government

‘make education for building energy efficiency and sustainability a compulsory topic for children at both primary and secondary school’. CIBSE will now take this forward.

CIBSE members chose the winning idea.

Young professionals lead debate on collaboration

The conference dinner debate, organised by the CIBSE Young Engineers’ Network, discussed

the statement: CIBSE believes that a sustainable built environment can only be achieved if the supply chain approaches all its projects in a holistic way and building services engineers work in integrated teams with other professions.

A panel of four young

professionals from different parts of the construction industry posited their views on the issue, which was then opened up to the audience for discussion. One of the four, Holly Porter,

an architect, argued that the procurement process is key to ensuring greater integration between members of project

teams. ‘This needs mutual respect by all team members.’ Paul Kalls, a quantity surveyor,

said professionals such as himself should be challenging the design put forward by building services consultancies: ‘We need to approach projects in a holistic way.’ Building services engineer

Emma Marshall, the CIBSE/ ASHRAE Graduate of the Year, stressed that ‘each member of the design team must be accommodating of the others – responsibility must be shared across the professions’. The client representative on the

panel, Richard Meier of developer Argent, agreed the collaboration is a good idea. But, he asked, what place is there for the architect or planner in such a collaborative process? ‘And the problem with collaboration is that it’s not in everyone interests,’ he said, adding that central government could give more incentives to clients to encourage them on sustainability. One audience member pointed

Panel member Richard Meier.

out that manufacturers can feel they are ‘at the bottom of the food chain’ among the various players in the industry. Meier agreed that it would be valuable to have more

Panel members, from left: Emma Marshall, Paul Kells and Holly Porter.

input from product makers. Porter said she felt it was better

to have manufacturers involved at an early stage: ‘We spend a lot of time writing specifications for products but have no role in choosing them.’ She also lamented the ‘erosion’

of the role of the architect in the building services industry in the past two decades. ‘We need to take some of the role back,’ she said. Marshall argued that: ‘Instead of

fitting services around the building works, we need to work on the early stages of the design to make the works as sustainable as possible.’ An audience member questioned

whether manufacturers offered too many solutions – why could they not provide more standardised services and prefabricated off-site solutions? Another member asserted: ‘Why is the industry still discussing collaboration. CIBSE needs to lead it. Let’s just do it!’

www.cibsejournal.com

June 2010 CIBSE Journal

19 Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com